Posted on 10/14/2005 10:21:47 PM PDT by dangus
Good vanity. Some may flame you but I fail to see how they could refute you.
Ah, such rhetorical skills:
"Well he is breaking something but I wouldn't call it news." -- Texasforever
"Fevered brain is right." -- unsycophant
(I take it your name is meant ironically?)
"You don't trust his judgment but you vote for him? Never understood that logic." -- Americanwolfsbrother
"brain fart" -- texasforever
"Until conservatives establish that credibility, the GOP isn't going to take very kindly to their recent tirades, and all of us will continue to suffer." -- Kryptonite
"also titled....."Babble babble babble, ramble ramble ramble"" -- Rokke
"LOL! I have not read one original thought yet. Just same old, same old. Heck, I just scan the crap now, if at all." -- onyx (also missing the irony of his comments
"You are the weakest link." -- Kryptonite
"black sheep Children of the Corn Conservatives ... pathologically gargantuan egos and large amounts of hubris ... O unhinged ones." -- Neville72
Non-sequitor award goes to:
"'He thought he could win over the French...He thought he could trust Turkey. He thought he could trust the United Nations. He seems to still think so.' Hehe...you don't really believe that do you? It is a strange type of liberal that thinks reducing taxes will help the economy recover and increase tax revenues."
Hell I was being kind. Your "skills" as a writer make you qualified for any burger flipping gig in the country.
Does there need to be a discussion of the Constitutionality of a fart in breaking news and whether that is a living fart or a strictly constructed fart?
You're taking this much too personal.
This whole HANG HARRIET is bombastic hyperbole.
I trust President Bush.
If I were you I wouldn't be calling anyone stupid. How many filibusters do you need to witness before you understand that the Republicans couldn't break them and then the gang of 14 hijacked the entire process?
>> yeah you could, but thats not what you said. <<
Um, actually I did. If I say a criticism among people who know what is laudatory about a man, do I have to specifically name each laudatory thing? Can I not just name the biggest? Or do you not think honesty and patriotism are all that important?
Say what you want, I've tired of your drivel. Yours must be a sorry lonely life.AWB
brain farts... regular farts... lets not go the diversity route on this.. a fart, is a fart, is a fart... a fart by any other name smells the same.
Does there need to be a discussion of the Constitutionality of a fart in breaking news and whether that is a living fart or a strictly constructed fart?
I think we approach the fart like our founding farters did. it is a living fart and each age should interpret that fart as it applies to their epoch in time as to whether it is a breaking news fart or not.
It takes only 50 votes to rule a filibuster out of order. And none of the seven took the "nuclear option" off the table if the Democrats tried to filibuster. In fact, only two need to vote for the nuclear option, and four explicitly backed it. As did one Democrat. So that's 53 certain votes.
You want rhetorical skills? To misquote a famous movie line "You can't handle rhetoric." Posting a rambling jumble of poorly connected thoughts that offer nothing new or enlightening to a topic of discussion that has been beaten to death for well over a week on FreeRepublic, doesn't merit a rhetorical response.
What do we do if a libertarian comes along and wants to just fart all the time all over the place in the name of freedom and then posts all of it everywhere as breaking wind...I mean news?
>> thoughts that offer nothing new or enlightening to a topic of discussion that has been beaten to death for well over a week <<
Here's a thesis statement:
I trust Bush's integrity, but his public flirting with Gonzalez makes me question his judgment.
You show me the article that contains that statement.
Excuse me... Us Libertarians are smarter than that.AWB
Oh. I see. The enlightenment we've been provided is why "dangus" questions Bush's judgment. Well let me tell you, questions about that issue have been looming over this site like an elephant in the livingroom. Fevered Freepmails have been flying behind the scenes with unenlightened Freepers speculating wildly on why "dangus" questions Bush's judgment. And then tonight...ENLIGHTENMENT. Thank you dangus. And what took you so long?
AWB's comment aside about libertarians being smarter then that... I full support the libertarians striving to have the breaking news floated all over the place if in a private forum i think the need to abide by the rules of that forums owner, or by the simply majority of that forums populous. in a public forum or public spaces I think they need to be guided by the norms of society and keep their breaking news to themselves..
Nice dodging the issue. Beneath all the hystericak ranting, your post boils down to this:
Couldn't find one, could you?
>> i think the need to abide by the rules of that forums owner, <<
For the record, so do I. I never did post it in "Breaking news" because I agree that it is not. I posted it into such categories as "vanity," "commentary," "constitution," and "poltics," but not "breaking news."
Are you sad.... you personal attacks on people make me think that you are a sad person... do you need a hug?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.