[InsureAmerica]

I respect your point, but you leave out the issue that this woman was in a position of authority which she abused. That negates any special treatment of 'protection of female sexuality' as far as I can see it. Just because I have a wee-wee and she doesn't, means men should be discriminated against in these matters?

[HitmanLV]

I must not have made myself clear, I'm sorry. The argument I presented doesn't negate anything:

The adult male who has sex with a 14 year-old girl both abused his authority and raped the girl.

The adult female who has sex with a 14 year old boy abused her authority and maybe some kind of assault.

They clearly both abused their power - that has to do with their role as teachers, now whether they are male or female. I have no idea what was confusing or ambiguous about that, and I don't disagree. I just don't think a female violating a male's sexuality in this context is rape, comparable to a male violating a female's sexuality in this context.

It's not unfair discrimination: the public policy concerns are different. Males just have different responsibilities because of the public policy reasons I mentioned.. That's not to say females have no responsibility, of course.

[MA North Shore]

...and, as in the twink European Union, it's considered a misdemeanor if a woman commits murder while she's on the rag with PMS.

This is true.

How about: "Yes, your Honor. I killed her, but I had this wicked sore male itch that Cruex couldn't help..."