Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

Absolutely not. No hold and Matt still gets that pass off, I disagree completely. And if they call that a push-off in the playoffs, you got to call that 10 times a game. Give me a break. In the playoffs, let them play. This isn't Week 3, this was the Superbowl.


330 posted on 02/06/2006 1:00:07 PM PST by WillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: WillT

Not at all, with the hold and being dragged away from Matt the defender got within two feet of Matt. No hold and Matt eats it, at the very least he's being hit while making the pass and it's not as accurate.

They should use the exact same rule interpretation in the playoffs the use in the regular season, and in the regular season that push-off is interference every single time it's done by a receiver or defender so it should be intereference in the SB, which it was. He pushed, that's against the rules, no reception.


332 posted on 02/06/2006 1:11:12 PM PST by discostu (a time when families gather together, don't talk, and watch football... good times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]

To: WillT
No hold and Matt still gets that pass off, I disagree completely.

Getting the pass off in time has nothing to do with it. When the ref sees the hold, he reaches for his flag. He's not trying to decide "if" the guy being held could get into the play or not. He has no way on knowing that.

And if they call that a push-off in the playoffs, you got to call that 10 times a game. Give me a break. In the playoffs, let them play. This isn't Week 3, this was the Superbowl.

It would be called 10 times a game if they saw it every time. The problem is they don't. Each official can only watch for one thing at a time. Same with holding on the line. It does not happen "every play" like Madden says, but it happens far more than it is called. Why? There are two officials watching for holding on the interior line --- the Referee and the Umpire They can't follow every block and they are often screened by these giants, so they do miss holding, offensive and defensive, many times. But when they see it, they call it and it does not matter diddly squat if it "changed" the outcome of the play.

As to "letting them play", doesn't that go both ways? On that end zone play, if the Steeler had pushed off and made the interception, would you say "let them play?"

As to pushing off in that situation, the receiver was stupid. First, he probably didn't have to push, and second, he knows, or should know that the Back Judge is stationed 10 feet behind him right on the end line and couldn't possibly miss the push. That's sort of like speeding past the police station.

It was a good call on a stupid foul, but don't blame the official --- he was doing his job and letting the defensive player "play too.'

It's amazing how having 32 cameras at the game and talking heads in the booth with the luxury of instant replay and the job requirement to "say something -- anything" has convinced people that officiating in the NFL has gone down hill. It hasn't. It's about the same as it's always been and always will be. Imperfect --- just like the players.

334 posted on 02/06/2006 2:21:09 PM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson