Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

XL draws estimated 90.7 million viewers, up 5 percent (Steelers still the biggest draw!)
sportsline.com ^ | Feb. 6, 2006 | AP News

Posted on 02/06/2006 4:41:56 PM PST by MarineBrat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Petronski
You da man!

Did you catch Hines Ward with the golden Mickey Mouse ears on his head?

Great!

Go Stillers

*****

Hank Stram:

"Just keep matriculatin' that ball down the field, boys."

"Mr. official ............ how could the six of you miss a play like that?"

LOL!

41 posted on 02/07/2006 12:39:52 AM PST by beyond the sea (Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat

I like your style!


42 posted on 02/07/2006 12:44:15 AM PST by beyond the sea (Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
So the pass interference was legitimate and that holding call was legitimate?

Yes, they both were legit calls. Tough for Seattle for sure but don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

Just your opinion. On the interference call, if the D-back had pushed exactly the way the receiver pushed, and made the interception in the end zone, should a flag have been thrown?

43 posted on 02/07/2006 5:16:05 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I thought it was a good game, actually. First half slow, second half much better.


44 posted on 02/07/2006 7:15:41 AM PST by RockinRight (Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Just your opinion. On the interference call, if the D-back had pushed exactly the way the receiver pushed, and made the interception in the end zone, should a flag have been thrown?

Why did he have to touch the defender, i mean why was the defender hanging onto him? Your not allowed to do that after 5 yards. If you don't call the defensive holding you shouldn't call the push-off, especially when the push-off wasn't needed for the separation

45 posted on 02/07/2006 12:06:43 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
First of all there was no "hanging" or holding on the play. There was a lot of hand checking by both players before the ball was in the air.

I'll try to make it easier for you by highlighting the applicable rules.

Actions that do not constitute pass interference include but are not limited to:

(a) Incidental contact by a defender’s hands, arms, or body when both players are competing for the ball, or neither player is looking for the ball. If there is any question whether contact is incidental, the ruling shall be no interference.

(b) Inadvertent tangling of feet when both players are playing the ball or neither player is playing the ball.

(c) Contact that would normally be considered pass interference, but the pass is clearly uncatchable by the involved players.

(d) Laying a hand on a receiver that does not restrict the receiver in an attempt to make a play on the ball.

(e) Contact by a defender who has gained position on a receiver in an attempt to catch the ball.

Actions that constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to:

(a) Blocking downfield by an offensive player prior to the ball being touched.

(b) Initiating contact with a defender by shoving or pushing off thus creating a separation in an attempt to catch a pass.

(c) Driving through a defender who has established a position on the field.

And I agree the push wasn't "necessary" --- he had position. But he pushed anyway and it was stupid, especially knowing that on that play, the back judge was on ten feet behind him and couldn't possibly miss it.

Don't be mad at the official who made the correct call. Be pissed at the player who committed a stupid, needless penalty that cost his team 6 points.

46 posted on 02/07/2006 1:12:19 PM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Why isn’t there any talk about the worst call in the Super Bowl? That would be the catch made my Seattle’s wide receiver, where he made a move down field, was hit and then fumbled. To add insult to injury, the ref blew the play dead before Pittsburgh could recover, making the play unchallengeable by Cower. That should have been a fumble, a Pittsburgh recovery, a returned for a touch-down and a 2 point conversion; as Seattle’s player gave up on the play after he fumbled. I like dealing with things that didn't happen, you can say anything you want and how can it not be true, because it didn't happen, anything could have happened.


47 posted on 02/08/2006 3:19:05 AM PST by MeanAsSnake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson