Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Echo Talon
First of all there was no "hanging" or holding on the play. There was a lot of hand checking by both players before the ball was in the air.

I'll try to make it easier for you by highlighting the applicable rules.

Actions that do not constitute pass interference include but are not limited to:

(a) Incidental contact by a defender’s hands, arms, or body when both players are competing for the ball, or neither player is looking for the ball. If there is any question whether contact is incidental, the ruling shall be no interference.

(b) Inadvertent tangling of feet when both players are playing the ball or neither player is playing the ball.

(c) Contact that would normally be considered pass interference, but the pass is clearly uncatchable by the involved players.

(d) Laying a hand on a receiver that does not restrict the receiver in an attempt to make a play on the ball.

(e) Contact by a defender who has gained position on a receiver in an attempt to catch the ball.

Actions that constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to:

(a) Blocking downfield by an offensive player prior to the ball being touched.

(b) Initiating contact with a defender by shoving or pushing off thus creating a separation in an attempt to catch a pass.

(c) Driving through a defender who has established a position on the field.

And I agree the push wasn't "necessary" --- he had position. But he pushed anyway and it was stupid, especially knowing that on that play, the back judge was on ten feet behind him and couldn't possibly miss it.

Don't be mad at the official who made the correct call. Be pissed at the player who committed a stupid, needless penalty that cost his team 6 points.

46 posted on 02/07/2006 1:12:19 PM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto

Why isn’t there any talk about the worst call in the Super Bowl? That would be the catch made my Seattle’s wide receiver, where he made a move down field, was hit and then fumbled. To add insult to injury, the ref blew the play dead before Pittsburgh could recover, making the play unchallengeable by Cower. That should have been a fumble, a Pittsburgh recovery, a returned for a touch-down and a 2 point conversion; as Seattle’s player gave up on the play after he fumbled. I like dealing with things that didn't happen, you can say anything you want and how can it not be true, because it didn't happen, anything could have happened.


47 posted on 02/08/2006 3:19:05 AM PST by MeanAsSnake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson