To: anymouse
Turns out sex might have evolved as a way to concentrate lots of harmful mutations into individual organ Correction. ... might have been designed as a way ...
To: plain talk
Correction. ... might have been designed as a way ... Certainly the language of the explanation in the article is more appropriate to the actions of a designer than to a set of natural processes.
49 posted on
03/02/2006 2:35:07 PM PST by
r9etb
To: plain talk; PatrickHenry
"Correction. ... might have been designed as a way"
Designed by whom, when? When did the first model roll off the assembly line and how was it done? Where's the designer now? What efforts are underway to answer these questions?
65 posted on
03/02/2006 3:08:57 PM PST by
adam_az
(It's the border, stupid!)
To: plain talk
What I see in this article are statement not to support evolution but statements that say that each species after its own kind maintains that species "purity" so that an elephant is always an elephant and all partial elephants are dropped out of the system.
Interesting that the scientific community would suggest something a) contrary to their god of Evolution -- stable rather than evolving species 2) something that could well be added to the Intelligent Design Debate.
69 posted on
03/02/2006 3:31:46 PM PST by
Rocketman
(Study to show thyself approved . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson