Central American Songbird Provides Confirmation of Intelligent Design

AP | 3/31/2005 | AP

[Oztrich Boy]

Could be an April Fool's thingie, I guess.

And from the University of Nebraska. Man, that's funny.

[Tribune7]

It's an April Fools joke.

[VadeRetro]

Glad to see you're still here. Hope it's still true on April 2.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

Thanks for the link. Beautiful bird.

[AndrewC]

Condorman is posting a evo-skeptic story.

And using AP as his source which is a source I always trust....

[Tribune7]

And using AP as his source which is a source I always trust....

LOL :-)

[ml1954]

Passed out and hung over again?

Each should worship in their own way. I believe there are many stories about how different cultures have chosen to worship the ID'er.

[narby]

Yes, the evidence is difficult to deny.

Do you realize how much new grant money this will generate PH?

Think of it, the signature of the designer right in this DNA. There should be some incredible new discoveries based on this.

[editor-surveyor]

" A little confession, a little penance, and I'm good to go.

But 'where' is the question. You might want to try the other door; I hear that they're taking cases like yours - No questions asked! :o)

[editor-surveyor]

What's a laugh here is that they act like it's the first time.

[editor-surveyor]

"In the picture, the motmot looks more like a kingfisher."

Motmot is a kingfisher.

[curmudgeonII]

Interesting. But hardly "proof".

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Interesting. But hardly "proof"."

This gene didn't *poof* out of thin air. It had to have been designed.

[AndrewC]

What's a laugh here is that they act like it's the first time.

No-kin-to-monkeys is brought to mind except that he was not trotted out on April fools day.

[editor-surveyor]

{"This gene didn't *poof* out of thin air. It had to have been designed."

OK, I get it, Designer Genes!

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" OK, I get it, Designer Genes!"

Heathen.

[bondserv]

I knew this would happen for one day!

[manwiththehands]

"Proof is really hard to come by."

OK. Here we go again.

"You want PROOF of evolution? PROOF? HUH? What is 'proof'? Let's not argue semantics here, OK? Proof is just a word. Proof doesn't mean a thing. We can't know for certain that '2+2=4' when we balance our checkbooks. If I write a program in 'C' I can say '2+2=bananas'. PROOF! HAHAHAHAHAHA. (scoff) Proof is for radical extremists who don't believe in science ..."

blah blah blah blah blah

[CarolinaGuitarman]

""You want PROOF of evolution? PROOF? HUH? What is 'proof'? Let's not argue semantics here, OK? Proof is just a word. Proof doesn't mean a thing."

Proof is real. But not in science.

[Dimensio]

What's a laugh here is that they act like it's the first time.

On the contrary. I have observed many April Fools joke articles written prior to this one.