Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Combating the big lie: Defending the Bible from 'The Da Vinci Code'
WorldNetDaily ^ | May 19, 2006 | By Dr. Ted Baehr

Posted on 05/19/2006 3:52:41 PM PDT by Simi Valley Tom

Editor's note: Dr. Tom Snyder contributed to this column. Dr. Ted Baehr is founder and publisher of MOVIEGUIDE®: A Family Guide to Movies and Entertainment and founder and chairman of the Christian Film & Television Commission. Dr. Tom Snyder is editor of MOVIEGUIDE®.

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

"The First Amendment provides for the separation of Church and State."

"The Founding Fathers were all deists."

"America is a racist country."

"Cuba is a worker's paradise."

"The Bible is contradictory."

"Jesus Christ didn't die on the Cross."

"The religious right in America wants to establish a totalitarian theocracy."

"Modern homo sapiens are descended from apes."

"Charles Darwin was an objective scientist."

"Jews are inherently inferior."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We've all heard these falsehoods bandied about in the mass media, including some of our most popular movies, books and TV programs. Some of you may even still believe some of them.

In his 1925 autobiography, "Mein Kampf," Adolf Hitler described a propaganda technique called the Big Lie. The Big Lie theory proposes that people are more likely to believe a Big Lie rather than a small one because they themselves usually only tell little lies. Thus, they can't bring themselves to believe that someone has the temerity to tell a colossal untruth that is easily punctured.

Contrary to popular opinion, Hitler wasn't overtly advocating the use of this technique himself. He actually was trying to accuse the Jews of spreading Big Lies to hurt the German race. Of course, later on his career, Hitler, with help from his propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, used the Big Lie to great effect, leading to the mass slaughter of millions, including 4 to 6 million Jews or more.

Dan Brown's book, "The Da Vinci Code," is a modern-day example of the powerful effect that a Big Lie can have in today's 24-hour news and entertainment cycle. Like the so-called "Jesus Seminar" before him (whose lies are still being preached by Dr. Marvin Meyer of Chapman University and other liberal scholars), Brown's book adopts the Big Lie of many atheist Christophobes. It claims that the New Testament gospels and basic Christian doctrines are unreliable sources of truth about Jesus Christ, invented by the Emperor Constantine in an effort to destroy the correct worship of the "Sacred Feminine."

Of course, modern scholarship by such people as William Lane Craig, Norman Geisler, John Warwick Montgomery, Gary Habermas, Craig Blomberg and many others has shown that we can have complete faith in the reliability of the life, death, resurrection and teachings of Jesus Christ described in the New Testament gospels, the Book of Acts, and the New Testament letters by Paul, Peter, James and John. And, since the publication of Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code," there have been a plethora of scholarly books, plus some shows on the History Channel, that explode the Big Lie that Dan Brown tells in his novel.

The facts prove the case.

We can rely on what the Bible says, not only because we have factual evidence to support it, but also because the Bible validates itself. The Bible validates itself by providing a reliable historical context in which to describe God's dealings with mankind throughout human history. Included within that historical context is a series of amazing prophecies about Jesus Christ, the Promised Messiah and Divine Savior of all mankind who died for our sins so that whoever believeth on Him, though we shall perish, yet we shall receive eternal life.

Don't surrender to Dan Brown's Big Lie. If you must see a movie this weekend, go see something like "Over The Hedge," "Akeelah And The Bee," "The Lost City," or even "Mission: Impossible III." Don't go see "The Da Vinci Code," much less read the book.

You probably don't want to see the movie anyway. According to Variety, in a review released on Tuesday, the movie is a dull piece of bloodless fiction that's 148 tedious minutes long. Surely, everyone has better things to do than sit through something like that! Never mind all the spurious attacks on Jesus and His apostles and the Bible contained in Dan Brown's story.

Note: For a review of the movie and the book, go to www.movieguide.org.


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bible; biglie; church; danbrown; davinci; davincicode; evolution; founders; frnutjobs; hanks; hitler; hollywood; jesus; jesuschrist; magdalene; movieguide; movies; state; tedbaehr; tomhanks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2006 3:52:43 PM PDT by Simi Valley Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom
"Jews are inherently inferior."

We've all heard these falsehoods bandied about in the mass media, including some of our most popular movies, books and TV programs.


Which of "our most popular movies, books and TV programs" pushed this?
2 posted on 05/19/2006 3:56:58 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom
I know a fairly left-leaning girl who happens to be studying classical history, and according to even her, the da Vinci Code is pure BS with no grounding in fact or history. I have no intention of reading the book or seeing the movie.

Nay, the next movie I see will be Snakes on a Plane. It promises to be a cinematic tour de force.

3 posted on 05/19/2006 3:57:56 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Simi Valley Tom

bttt


5 posted on 05/19/2006 3:59:46 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (FreeRepublic and Rush Limbaugh: kevlar protection from the Drive-By Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"Jews are inherently inferior."
We've all heard these falsehoods bandied about in the mass media, including some of our most popular movies, books and TV programs.

Which of "our most popular movies, books and TV programs" pushed this?

SouthPark's Cartman, speaking about Kyle


6 posted on 05/19/2006 4:01:30 PM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom
Christians protesting The DaVinci Code have given the book and the movie more free publicity than the author and the studios could ever have hoped to have been able to afford.

I'm sure they thank you.

7 posted on 05/19/2006 4:01:37 PM PDT by Amelia (Education exists to overcome ignorance, not validate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom
Oh, for pete's sake! Get a life, Church! How can you get so bent out of shape by a bad sci-fi movie? We Jews have been getting slandered for 5,000 years by unfiendly people who want us all dead. Open a newspaper overseas for a chance. Grow a callus. Get tough or find another line of work.


8 posted on 05/19/2006 4:06:07 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom

C'mon Tom, fess up. You work for Sony Pictures.


9 posted on 05/19/2006 4:06:52 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Isn't it true that the Word of the Lord never changes.......

But movies and books and media and all manner of entertainment does.

Actually, I don't think yhis piece of entertainment was meant to be taken seriously.

10 posted on 05/19/2006 4:11:38 PM PDT by R_Kangel ("He who lives in glass houses should never invite "He who is without sin" into his house!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom
Honestly, Cecil B. DeMille must be rolling over in his grave.

There was a period of time in this country when religious stories of any type were welcomed.

These days, if you film a religious themed story (Mel Gibson, Ron Howard), it is jumped on with both feet, from the left, the right and the center.

Is discussion really that bad? DeMille didn't think so.

If one person saw this movie and decided that, in fact, the bible was correct, wouldn't it be worth it. The other side of the coin, is the bible on such thin ice that a film can upset the whole thing?
11 posted on 05/19/2006 4:11:54 PM PDT by Lokibob (Spelling and typos are copyrighted. Please do not use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom
I am still amazed at the vilification and the credit given Brown for these ideas.

Good glory - he was even sued by contemporary writers, Leigh and Baigent, for "stealing their ideas" from their NON-fiction book: Holy Blood, Holy Grail."

Altho' a bogus suit to begin with as one cannot copyright ideas - and they lost their shirts as the judge told them just that - it should have clued some of the clueless to the fact that the 'ideas' in Brown's books did not come from him...

These "ideas" have been around for 2000 years...and even, currently, there are many other books - Nonfictional now in print that go into much deeper detail and list bibliographies...

One in particular, that got Brown started, was the book "The Woman with the Alabaster Jar" (dare I say it again, NON-fiction)written by a life long Catholic with an impressive bio.

Yet nowhere have I heard a hue and cry about these authors and their claims in their NON-fiction books. Curious>

Is it that people just aren't reading that much anymore?

For those who might have an individual mind, it might be interesting to check out some of the NON-fiction books.

the aforementioned "the Woman With..." by Margaret Starbird, is a great starting point - and then moving on to Sir Laurence Gardner's books, etc.

(Starbirds' bio: Margaret Starbird holds BA and MA degrees from the University of Maryland where she concentrated in comparative literature, medieval studies and German language, studies she pursued on a Fulbright Student Grant at the Christian Albrechts Universitat in Kiel, Germany. She taught German language at the University of Maryland for four years and for one year at North Carolina State University. She later studied at Vanderbilt Divinity School in Nashville, TN. She has lived and traveled extensively in Europe including pilgrimages to Black Madonna and Mary Magdalene shrines and Cathar citadels in Provençe." her web site:

http://www.margaretstarbird.net/

Here's a stained glass window in a church in Europe - longggg before Brown was born.

For all those demanding 'truth' - maybe you should stop blaming/crediting Brown with these "ideas" - it ain't true

12 posted on 05/19/2006 4:12:58 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Now Lokibob - don't go confusing these folk with common sense - it doesn't appear many of them can handle that
13 posted on 05/19/2006 4:16:05 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom

I will bet if any one of these people that say they do not have faith are the first ones up offering prayers to God when something goes wrong.

They don't understand how sustaining faith is; our comforting it is. I can't imagine a life without it.


14 posted on 05/19/2006 4:22:28 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
"These days, if you film a religious themed story (Mel Gibson, Ron Howard)"

I think that is the argument. Is a movie that says the foundation of Christianity is a lie (that Christ died so our sins would be forgiven), and as such Christianity is a fraud and "religious themed story". I'll argue no. It may have a religious back drop, but it is no more religious themed than Night of the living Dead.
15 posted on 05/19/2006 4:24:01 PM PDT by MPJackal ("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Christians protesting The DaVinci Code have given the book and the movie more free publicity than the author and the studios could ever have hoped to have been able to afford.

I'm sure they thank you.

As a Christian, I take a very different view from the boycotters -- I see DVC as an opportunity to bring discussion about Christianity to the surface in a way and at a detailed level never seen in the modern secular era.

My motto, and maybe I'll get a T-shirt to this effect, is:

"Secular America, PLEASE DO go see The DaVinci Code. And please do give in to that sophomoric impulse you'll feel to come looking for folks like me to rub my nose in it so I can straighten you out."

So I hope DVC turns out to be the highest-grossing movie of all time.

I thank you...

16 posted on 05/19/2006 4:28:38 PM PDT by Zhangliqun (Hating Bush does not count as a strategy for defeating Islamic terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal
ok, then the evolution discussion is dead, because it has a religious backdrop, but not religious themed.
17 posted on 05/19/2006 4:30:00 PM PDT by Lokibob (Spelling and typos are copyrighted. Please do not use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom

This book/movie is just the beginning of the emerging of new (old) truth, however imperfect, that will challenge the creeds of orthodox western religion, which in my opinion, is due for a large overhaul.


18 posted on 05/19/2006 4:30:28 PM PDT by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simi Valley Tom

"The First Amendment provides for the separation of Church and State." True

"The Founding Fathers were all deists." False

"America is a racist country." False

"Cuba is a worker's paradise." False

"The Bible is contradictory." True

"Jesus Christ didn't die on the Cross." Unknown

"The religious right in America wants to establish a totalitarian theocracy." False

"Modern homo sapiens are descended from apes." True

"Charles Darwin was an objective scientist." True

"Jews are inherently inferior." False


19 posted on 05/19/2006 4:33:13 PM PDT by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal
Carrying on with my rant:

The new mantra is : "I never saw the Cecil B. DeMille movie "The Bible" because I read the book".

Is this how we are going to go bravely into the 21st century?
20 posted on 05/19/2006 4:35:33 PM PDT by Lokibob (Spelling and typos are copyrighted. Please do not use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson