If a political candidate only received one third of the vote, it would be said they lost in a landslide, but this qualifies as having a big impact.
1 posted on
05/25/2006 8:05:06 AM PDT by
adamjeeps
To: adamjeeps
Ever wonder if the US business leaders and politicians have manipulated the market in order to keep GM, Ford, afloat with a new buying frenzy for more fuel efficient cars? The mini-van, then the SUV's were the frenzies of the last decade when gas was much much cheaper.
2 posted on
05/25/2006 9:06:48 AM PDT by
RSmithOpt
(Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
To: adamjeeps
It's two different things though, on an election day everybody who has an opinion votes. Not everybody buys a car in any relatively short period of time. On the other side though 1/3 of people buying a car over the next few months to a year would probably be good for the economy, even if only a small percentage of them are new that's still a lot of manufactured durable goods getting paid for.
3 posted on
05/25/2006 9:10:58 AM PDT by
discostu
(get on your feet and do the funky Alphonzo)
To: adamjeeps
It will take most people a while to recover the price of a new vehicle. At today's prices I spend about $1500 a year on gas. Doubling my mileage (unlikely) would save me only $750.
4 posted on
05/25/2006 9:14:26 AM PDT by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson