North American Union Is No Conspiracy

Human Events Online ^ | Jul 21, 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Trupolitik]

Just as Dr. Corsi has encouraged Mr Hawkins to continue the debate, I enourage all of you to read the documents youselves. Compare them with each other and with the incremental and methodical manner in which the EU is being created.

Some of you will most suredly say, "A North American Union will never happen. Americans will never allow it". THAT is EXACTLY why we should be examining these documents today. "never allowing it" begins with us, the freepers and bloggers who read and research the issues ourselves, without having to be told from someone in the media that it is happening and which side to take. If we resolves ourselves to being that kind of creature, we are no better than the liberals we debate.

[Trupolitik]

and of course...the administrators without having read the entire article, hurridly file this away as into the "conspiracy" forum.

What ever will you do when more and more information is released and your readers see that you have pushed this information into the back channels of your site?

Again I ask you, what are you afraid of?

[hedgetrimmer]

PING

[1rudeboy]

bttt
for a good laugh later

[processing please hold]

Just look at some of the keywords. Ridicule is still a game some play. All those keywords and only 5 post.

[OB1kNOb]

Thanks for posting. Ignore the ankle-biters. They're infected with the New Orleans Katrina Virus. You can tell them a disaster is coming and they'll still ignore it until it hits them and then they'll claim to be blind-sided victims and ask why no one warned them. It's an epidemic in America.

[processing please hold]

Have y'all seen this thread...

Bush worried about border-hopping terrorist

[hedgetrimmer]

They're infected with the New Orleans Katrina Virus.

That just about sums it up.

[janetgreen]

The fact that this "merger" is even being discussed without disclosure to American citizens should be enough to raise a huge red flag in our minds.

Each one of us who questions this needs to contact Senators and Representatives and ask them for a personal response to our concerns.

The time it would take to speak with those who are supposed to be representing us is worth it, because an insane plan like this would change America forever.

[1rudeboy]

We've been discussing it here for weeks, and the alleged vehicle for the merger (the SPP) has its own website.

[OB1kNOb]

Yup.

[subterfuge]

Thanks Tru. Many so-called conspiracy theories have ended up as fact. Agent Orange for one.

[Smartass]

Thursday, July 20, 2006

---

---

THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
Congressman presses on 'super-state' plan
Asks Bush administration to fully disclose its activities

---

Posted: July 20, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern

---

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala.

A congressman is pressing the Department of Commerce to fully disclose a congressionally unauthorized plan to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that critics say could lead to a North American union.

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., chairman of the Subcommittee on Management, Integration and Oversight of the House Committee on Homeland Security, wrote July 11 to Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez requesting detailed disclosure of working groups in the Security and Prosperity Partnership office within his department.

Referring to an attached letter from a constituent, Rogers wrote to Gutierrez:

Judging by information contained in this letter, a number of legitimate concerns are raised regarding the implementation and operation of the SPP, including the membership and charge of its working groups; potential memoranda of understanding with foreign countries; and whether there has been any Congressional oversight of these working group, to name a few.

Rogers concluded by asking Gutierrez for a prompt review of the issues and for a response "as soon as possible."

The attached constituent letter was written by Eunie Smith, president of Eagle Forum of Alabama and by Bob Couch. They posed the following questions to Rogers:

• What is the membership of the 30 SPP working groups?

• What is the charge/working agenda of each of the 30 SPP working groups?

• Please provide to me any trilateral memoranda of understanding and other trilateral agreements with Mexico and Canada.

• Please provide findings, reports and presentations of the working groups.

• Under what congressional action are these working groups constituted?

• What congressional oversight is there of this process?

• Are the working groups redefining American laws to make them tri-lateral?

• What specific plans are there for reporting to Congress?

The constituents' letter also suggested four lines of inquiry should congressional hearings be convened to examine SPP working group activities:

• Is the sovereignty of the United States threatened since it has been reported that a North American court and a parliamentary body are being proposed, complete with the "Amero" to replace the U.S. dollar?

• Wouldn't an "outer security perimeter" remove the capacity of policing our borders from the hands of United States citizens?

• Isn't "harmonizing entry screening and visa and asylum regulations" code for a quantum leap in liberalizing our country's immigration laws?

• What about the May 2005 CFR Task Force documents calling for a "seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico" and for a "permanent tribunal for North American dispute regulation," as well as calling for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the U.S.

The constituents' letter also attached a copy of a July 2005 article by Eagle Forum founder Phyllis Schlafly entitled, "The Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada."

Schlafly was one of the first analysts and commentators to question the purpose of SPP. In her article, she wrote that the Council on Foreign Relations task force report entitled "Building a North American Community" let the "cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries."

Schlafly argued the CFR task force report "spells out a five-year plan for the 'establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community' with a common 'outer security perimeter.'"

She commented:

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin 'committed their governments' to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

Rogers' letter to Gutierrez supports a demand for information made last month by Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.

Smith, on behalf of Eagle Forum of Alabama, told WND she is "very pleased" with Rogers' commitment to inquire into the SPP operations.

---

SPECIAL OFFER: For a comprehensive look at the U.S. government's plan to integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada into a North American super-state – guided by the powerful but secretive Council on Foreign Relations – read "ALIEN NATION: SECRETS OF THE INVASION," a special edition of WND's acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine.

---

Previous stories:

Feds stonewalling on 'super state' plan?

Bush 'super-state' documents sought

Tancredo confronts 'super-state' effort

Bush sneaking North American super-state without oversight?

---

[texastoo]

Good article. Hopefully, some other congressmen will confront the Bush Administration. The majority of Americans still don't use the computer, so Bush lame excuse that it is on the internet sucks. He is as sneaky as his dad.

[Smartass]

:o)

     
Support the war on terror...

 

[potlatch]

Thanks for the ping SmartA

[Smartass]

:o)

   

 

[potlatch]

LOL, better get out your dustcloth!!

[Smartass]

What can I say...
LOL, they ran out of bandwidth!

 

[potlatch]

Yep, it happens to all of us sometimes!!