Excellent post (#13), Smartass.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America has as its first essential word ‘security’. What comes to mind when one reflects on the word ‘security’ in a geopolitical sense? Protection from invasion? Protection from attack? The ability to feel confident that unfriendly people, or weapons in the wrong hands, are not able to gain access to one’s environment?
Question: Why is our leadership in Washington concerning itself with the security of the continent when the security of our republic is in such toxic disrepair, and when the threats to our lives and liberties have never been greater? And why should the U.S. enter into a security partnership with a country whose political and military leadership continues to demand that the most vulnerable aspect of our national security remains unaddressed, and who benefits from our exposed vulnerability?
Possible answer: Because our elitist leaders in Washington are more interested in uniting Mexico, Canada and the U.S. into one geopolitical/economic entity than they are in retaining the security and sovereignty of the U.S. And continuing to allow the invasion of illegal aliens from Mexico simply furthers that agenda.
And the fact that there are also terrorist elements gaining entrance to the U.S. via our unguarded southern border is perceived by proponents of the North American Union as simply an unfortunate by-product of the planned … even desired … influx of Mexican illegals.
For those who claim that a wall/fence is impractical and/or ineffective, see Israel’s Security Fence. If one can read this entire account, and still disbelieve that the U.S. needs, and would be made significantly more secure by erecting, a fence along our vulnerable southern border, then I suspect that one is irrevocably of one mind with the North American Union proponents.
The administration, and congress, are well aware of the financial practicality (when compared to the financial nightmare engendered by the illegal aliens’ obscene parasitic drain on the American taxpayer/treasury) of building a wall, as well as the extraordinary successes recorded by Israel in doing so.
Tom Tancredo, in his book ‘Mortal Danger’, writes, We have the necessary technology, combined with human resources, to secure our borders tomorrow. It is a canard for politicians to say that it is impossible and that we must figure out a different way to defend America rather than defending our borders. What they are really saying is, ‘I choose not to defend and secure our borders because there are political ramifications that I fear.’ It is those fears that put the life of every American citizen in mortal danger.
There will be no wall (physical or otherwise) built along our southern border. Mexicans by the thousands will daily continue to stream into our country. Islamo-fascists will cross that border as well. And I don’t know which threat is worse … the dissolution of America’s borders as we are swallowed up by the North American Union, or the prospect of another devastating attack on American soil by madmen from the Middle East.
The so-called NAU/SPP ‘conspiracy theorists’ are simply more capable, than those who choose to ridicule them, of connecting some extremely disturbing dots.
~ joanie
Allegiance and Duty Betrayed
Good read Joanie...
Imagine, how much America have given up to Mexican illegals, and how little Mexico has relinquished in return...ZERO.
There are approximately 30 million illegal immigrants scattered about, sucking up our oxygen and resources. It would be only fair that Mexico cede say, Baja California to the United States in payment for this generosity? Moreover, how about ceding to the United States one third of Mexico, for every thirty million that crawl under the fence? Some would say this would be unfair, why?
