Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 7thson
I have a couple questions concerning firearms.

They're only stupid questions if you've repeatedly been told the answers and refuse to learn. And in particular, if you're looking to compare answers to find particular gems of accuracy or profundity, you're well on your way to erasing any residual ignorance left over from before you asked.

Basic question one - what is the difference between a pistol and a revolver?

Sometimes it's derivitive from legalistic or linguistic definitions [the term is pretty generally accepted to have originated from the gunmaking town of Pistoia in Italy] but modern technical usages defines a pistol as a handgun with a single firing chamber, such as a single-shot or semiauto handgun, while a revolver utilizes multiple chambers, usually arranged axially. Note that there are also double and miltiple-barrel handguns that are neither revolvers nor pistols, and also multi-revolving barrel weapons that if handheld, do qualify as revolvers. Multi-barrel weapons such as the Gatling Gun are asls revolver or revolving-barrel weapons, but are not handguns.

Basic question two - what is the difference between single action and double action?

The terms are generally meant to describe handgun, a single-actionbeing one in which an exposed or mechanically accessable hammer must be manually cocked for firing, and a double action [sometimes also seen as *double-acting* or *trigger cocking*] mechanism as one in which a pull on the trigger also cams the trigger or striker to the rear. There have also been *hammerless* trigger-cocking mechanisms in which the external hammer is eliminated, usually replacved by an internal mechanical striker or concealed hammer, thereby requiring a long and hard but consistant trigger pull for each shot. There are also intermediate variations and mechanical exceptions, though the descriptions served well enough to describe the simple revolver action designs of the 1880s. Things have changed since then, however.

Basic question three - which should a beginner go with - revolver, pistol, SA, or DA?

It depends much on what you're trying to accoplish; the question is as broad as asking *what kind of car should I drive?*

For self-defence/ home defence purposes, a revolver is generally quite effective, easy to learn, reasonably cost-effective to feed, simple to maintain, and can be left loaded in a constant state of readiness with all springs at rest. Examples of the breed served most of America's police agencies through most of the XX Century, and now that those agencies have chosen to militarize their equipment, the leftovers can be found as real bargtains...or the manufacturing experience of firms that built the things for the last ten or twelve decades can be taken advgantage of if a new-built one is preferred. If needed, most versions can be simply picked up and fired, day or night, without concern as to the positioning of various safety devices or other mechanical function switches, though prudence demands checking the condition of the handgun EVERY time it's picked up after leaving your hand, whether revolver or otherwise.

The most usual alternative to the revolver is the semiautomatic or semiauto handgun [though I've been happily equipped with exceptions a couple of times such is really for those either very experienced or very desperate] The most proven version of which is the M1911 design, having been widely used by the US military from 1911 to 1984, and which remains in military use here and there. It's simple enough for even a relatively untrained Private to learn to safely use, and maintainance is similarly basic soldier-friendly. Though the first half of the XX Century found that design offered in only three primary calibers [.22, .45, and the .38 Super commercial version] there is now an almost bewildering array of calibers, variants and manufacturers from which to choose for those who favour Browning's 1911 design. More recent alternatives from Beretta, Glock, SIG-Sauer and others are certainly worthy and better suited to modern manufacturing methods. But the M1911 .45 handgun has withstood a test of time that most of them still require five decades of use to equal.


43 posted on 08/04/2006 11:24:21 AM PDT by archy (I am General Tso. This is my Chief of Staff, Colonel Sanders....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: archy

Thank you.


58 posted on 08/07/2006 3:28:42 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson