You were doing so well!... Then you just had to insert this bit: "This indicates an unintelligent Designer, not an intelligent one." I was so disappointed to read that assertion after you had so admirably listed many of the design specs Science has discovered in this extremely complex matrix of meaningful change from random events.
Sorry, I'm not trying to insult God or anything. I'm showing how it isn't smart to support the idea that God essentially *poofed* things into existence rather than being more creative and using evolution. Otherwise, there would *no* need for ERVs, pseudogenes, noncoding DNA, et cetra. I'm not trying to insult God - I'm trying to show why it isn't a good idea logically to say God didn't use evolution.