Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1

>>>If the DNA is inconclusive and the print doesn't match then they've got lots of wiggle room. >>>

I have a legal question. If he pleads guilty, confessed, do they even need to 'prove' a case?


28 posted on 08/20/2006 6:52:15 PM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: sandbar

If they charge him and he pleads not guilty, then no, they don't have to prove a case.

But you don't charge someone unless you think you can prove the case, because you don't know if they will plead guilty.

On the other hand lots of people claim they have been coerced into pleady guilty to lesser charges because they were being "railroaded" on more serious charges.

Don't know how often that happens in real life, but doubt it could happen in such a high profile case.

If he is part of an international cartel of pedophile child porn traders I expect him to stop breathing soon after reaching the U.S.


29 posted on 08/20/2006 7:14:24 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Big Media is like Barney Fife with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: sandbar
"I have a legal question. If he pleads guilty, confessed, do they even need to 'prove' a case?"

I believe I have run into information in the past that in many jurisdictions some additional corroboration is necessary. I don't know for Colorado, specifically.

32 posted on 08/22/2006 9:29:30 AM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: sandbar

Yes, they must prove the case, but it will be much easier to prove with a confession.


33 posted on 08/22/2006 11:05:33 AM PDT by ableLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson