To: SirLinksalot
This is a statement of the main points of why a lot of mathematicians, when they consider the evidence, tend to be skeptical about the Darwinian theory of evolution.
To: SirLinksalot
Only you and Dembski, if you aren't the same person. And if you aren't Dembski, then
you are a plagiarist.
23 posted on
09/20/2006 10:26:44 AM PDT by
js1138
(The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
To: SirLinksalot
The article makes a lot of sense.
Thank you for posting it.
27 posted on
09/20/2006 10:30:07 AM PDT by
stultorum
(What's your opinion? I'd like to know.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
The mathematical improbability of arriving at life (and a world so perfectly suited for life) as we observe it today solely by chance and natural processes even given any ridiculous amount of time suggested so far is incredibly very low--essentially null.
....a central point in the creation/design vs. world arriving by chance debate/discussion
article/thread well suited for mass ping :)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson