Replies

Really, about the only area in which we differ is in our beliefs regarding supernatural entities.

That's not a very large difference, it seems to me.

It is an essential difference. It changes the basis for our rights and responsibitlies and the very meaning of our existence. It makes us come up with different results over the question of whether man is better than the dumb beasts of the world, or only different. The "Why" of everything changes. "why" shouldn't you kill a human. "Why" should you sacrifice your life for someone you know, or an idea, or someone you haven't met, "Why" mercy killing or suicide is right or wrong.

It is what changed Whitaker Chambers from being a hardcore Communist to risking his life fighting against them.

For me, anyway, it provides hope, the ability to continue to love those who died, purpose, a moral framework larger than any imperfect government can provide, a way to (imperfectly, I'm afraid) try to see good in people I'd just as soon not like, and finally a way of thinking and looking at the world that is consistent with my own nature: a desire for order, and a love of creativity and higher ideals and purpose.

Does God exist?

Is there an afterlife?

In that afterlife, is there reward and punishment for what sort of life one has led prior to arriving in that afterlife?

Is there a set of objective and binding guidelines for one's behavior in life that determines one's eternal destiny?

If the answers to these four questions are an emphatic yes, as most Americans believe whether in response to divine revelation or to common sense observations, our society must be ordered accordingly with personal altruism being a virtue as most of us believe and not a crime as Ayn Rand and Margaret Sanger believed, a society in which there is recognition of an obligation to enforce objective right and wrong (as even our pagan Greek and Roman forebears agreed), a society structured on principle and reason and not a moral anarchy in which each individual defines morality for himself or herself and devil (dissenters should pardon the expression) take the hindmost, also a society which recognizes that neither government of whatever sort nor the unrestrained individual is or ever can be our highest authority.

Ann Coulter's latest book Goddess, whoops (I must read the title and not just look at the cover picture), that is, GODLESS has a lot of worthwhile fun to poke at those with imagination so limited as to accept Darwin.

Her analysis is far better than my usual one whereby I am willing to concede that Darwinists are descended from apes or whatever so long as they are willing to concede that the rest of us are descended from Adam and Eve via the wonders of God.