[Mrs Ivan]

This is like complaining about a rich person giving a million dollars to a charity and then saying "well why didn't he give 2 million ?!"

I disagree.

Why the need to publicise the adoption? Why are older children less worthy of celebrity attention?

Is it because the only disadvantaged children are babies, or is it because they would be too much wotk for Hollywood attention whores to cope with, and have far less cutesy photogenic appeal than babies?

[strider44]

"I disagree.

Why the need to publicise the adoption? Why are older children less worthy of celebrity attention?

Is it because the only disadvantaged children are babies, or is it because they would be too much wotk for Hollywood attention whores to cope with, and have far less cutesy photogenic appeal than babies?"

So you're saying it's better that they adopt nobody if they don't take the older kids?

That's crazy.

[napscoordinator]

Why the need to publicize the adoption? Why are older children less worthy of celebrity attention?



Do you think that Jolie and Brad really want this attention. They want privacy but because of the greedy media they can't even go to the bathroom without being notified. I think these kids are better off with someone who wants them then the parents that dumped them off at the adoption clinic because they did not have an abortion fast enough. I think that Jolie is a wonderful human being for taking an interest in raising children. Just because people here have their two children and feel satisfied that they did enough for human nature does not mean she had to stop at two. People can be so selfish unlike Jolie who wants to share her money with children for a better life. Get over your selfishness (not you Mrs. Ivan).