When I read the leader I thought that this would be the kind of pituitary tinkering that would be done in, say, a post-polio situation with a withered leg. All I can really say is... damn.
The hysterectomy is interesting, actually, because if she's as disabled as the article suggests, she's incapable of giving sexual consent. The idea of reproductive rights becomes tangled.
I'd hate to have been on that ethics panel.