To: SmithL
Only 36,000 seats? That's a joke, right?
3 posted on
11/07/2006 8:03:54 AM PST by
subterfuge
(Tolerance has become the greatest virtue, and hypocrisy the worst character defect.)
To: subterfuge
"Only 36,000 seats? That's a joke, right?"
True -- it is aboiut 20,000 too many.
4 posted on
11/07/2006 8:04:55 AM PST by
MikeyGo
(Pray for our warriors. And pray their political enemies will not have the power to stop them.)
To: subterfuge
It's still more than Fenway or Wrigley, right?
10 posted on
11/07/2006 8:24:43 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: subterfuge
The trend lately seems to be to fewer seats. They think it makes them more disirable.
17 posted on
11/07/2006 9:38:27 AM PST by
TBP
To: subterfuge
18 posted on
11/07/2006 9:38:42 AM PST by
TBP
To: subterfuge
36,000 seats is not bad for a baseball-only stadium. After all, what is the seating capacity of Fenway Park and Wrigley Field anyway? And those 36,000 seats will be vastly more comfortable than any seating at Fenway or Wrigley....
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson