Posted on 11/07/2006 11:20:42 PM PST by trumandogz
I am going to puke...
It will be Hillary they don't have a choice.
don't like his style(I'd rather have Barbour or Coburn if i was going for a congress critter)
The Dems are stupid but not that stupid.
She should settle on being Senator for Life From NY.
He has 25+ years in the House and some questionable ties to Randy "Duke" Cunningham(If you think we can be beat the MSM with kind of stuff you're crazy)
First I've heard of this. Source, please?
Since 1994, Wilkes and ADCS gave $40,700 in campaign contributions to Rep. Duncan Hunter, a San Diego Republican who now chairs the House Armed Services Committee. Hunter has acknowledged that he joined with Cunningham in 1999 to contact Pentagon officials who reversed a decision and gave ADCS one of its first big contracts, for nearly $10 million. Hunter's spokesman, Joe Kasper, said the congressman was unavailable for comment Tuesday.
even if he is totally clean the lying MSM will NOT let it go.
OMG, my ears my ears.
If one digs deep enough, evidence can be found that all politicians have made some bad moves. Looks like you're "tainting" with a broad brush on this one. Just because Hunter joined Cunningham to award a contract to another company doesn't mean he's corrupt. That kind of stuff happens constantly. You can bet your bippy if Hunter personally profited like Cunningham did, we'd know about it. There's a big difference in a pol bribing or enriching themselves through big business vs. getting lobbied by big business.
Like i said, I doesn't matter if he is guilty or not, he will be guilty in the eyes of the MSM and by extension their audience.
Wilkes' ties to Hunter and Cunningham go beyond campaign contributions. In 2003, the businessman's foundation hosted a "Salute to Heroes" gala to give Hunter an award, just as it did for Cunningham a year earlier. The Wilkes Foundation gave $1,000 in 2003 to a charity run by two of Hunter's staffers, records show.
WOW, a whole $1000? sheesh... was that in 20's, 50's or 100's LOL
If he's totally clean, then he doesn't have anything to worry about. Using that logic, we may as well roll over and let the MSM taint our good guys and pick our next presidential candidate. That's ridiculous. Granted, they'll try their best to gush over the McCain's in our party as usual.
Macaka.
well, I'm really irritated and sleepy... Have a good morning/Night... IF he gets nominated I will vote for him(obviously) I just won't vote for him in the primaries
Indeed, but good men & women who want to run for public office can't throw in the towel and completely surrender to the media now can we?
nope, but I think we have better/more electable people than him. nite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.