Sir Churchill was indeed a very wise man.
He was not alone.
In stark contrast, John Quincy Adams, who made seminal contributions to the formulation of U.S. foreign policy, possessed a remarkably clear, uncompromised understanding of the permanent Islamic institution of jihad war, and its corollary institution, dhimmitude. Regarding jihad, Adams, in his essay series dealing with the Russo-Turkish War, and on Greece, (written while JQA was in retirement, before his election to Congress in 1830, Chapters X-XIV [pp. 267-402] in The American Annual Register for 1827-28-29. New York, 1830), states,
he [Muhammad] declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind
The precept of the Koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God
the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.
And Adams captured the essential condition imposed upon the non-Muslim dhimmi tributaries subjugated by jihad, with this laconic statement,
The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22314
Yes he sure was....maybe we should send this to the White House. Its a shame that Prince Charles is embracing Islam so much too.