Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fumbles, missteps hindered search. On a hunch, local pilot found mother, kids alive.
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 12/10/2006 | Jaxon Van Derbeken, Peter Fimrite

Posted on 12/10/2006 6:38:04 AM PST by surfer

For four days, as the snowbound Kim family's food supplies dwindled and they used up their gas running their stranded car's heater, no one even knew they were missing.

It was two more days before rescuers narrowed the search to roads leading across thousands of square miles of western Oregon, and another day before cell phone transmissions helped to pinpoint the search area.

While the speed of the investigation in some ways was remarkable -- given what little authorities started out with -- it was dogged by early missteps and obstacles that handicapped investigators.

A Portland hotel where the family had stayed refused to provide credit card records that might have indicated which way the Kims had gone. An early search by air and land of the treacherous mountain route that James and Kati Kim drove out of Grants Pass yielded nothing.

The owner of a lodge on the road where the Kims' car was stuck had told authorities three days before Kati Kim and her daughters were found that he had seen tire tracks in the snow, but he hadn't been able to follow them in his snowmobile once he hit bare ground. No one followed up.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: family; jameskim; missing; search
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-206 next last
It is true that James Kim made some mistakes. But many things went wrong before and after the Kim family went missing.

Please take the time and read the article in its entirety before posting a response. This article really opens your eyes.

What we all take away from this tragedy is very important. In the future what we have learned from this may save someone else.

1 posted on 12/10/2006 6:38:06 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: surfer
Thanks, surfer...the screw-ups made my blood boil...but there sure were some never-give-up heroes, too!

I'll be pinging this today!

2 posted on 12/10/2006 6:42:25 AM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surfer

The most fundamental mistake the Kims made was not having taken seriously enough the dangers involved in driving through unfamiliar mountains in snowy weather after nightfall. They're lucky only James died.


3 posted on 12/10/2006 6:45:50 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surfer
Great details on the case. What really stands out, though, is the power of individuals acting in their own best interests who have detailed knowledge of their particular field. The lodge owner, the cell phone engineer, the helicopter pilot, the Kim's sister...the list goes on and on.

It really shows that if your family member is the one at risk you can't just rely on the authorities to conduct the investigation. Without the involvement of private citizens it's likely the Kims still wouldn't be found.

4 posted on 12/10/2006 6:52:27 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

The most fundamental mistake the Kim's made was relying on local LE to ensure their safety. The road they took was supposed to have been gated and locked. The lock was vandalized. If LE knew this - that is negligence period.

You cannot blame the Kim's for making mistakes based on bad information - it happens to all of us on a daily basis.


5 posted on 12/10/2006 6:58:52 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Without the involvement of private citizens it's likely the Kims still wouldn't be found.

Thank God there are still good people in the world!

6 posted on 12/10/2006 6:59:23 AM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
The most fundamental mistake the Kims made was not having taken seriously enough the dangers involved in driving through unfamiliar mountains in snowy weather after nightfall.

Of course they made an error but they weren't trying to take chances from other things I've read. They didn't plan on taking the road they ended up on. In fact that road was supposed to be blocked by a gate but vandals broke the lock and the gate was wide open so they probably didn't see the gate so it didn't look like a closed road. They thought they were on a well traveled road, or at least not on a closed road. It's easy to lay blame and pass judgement.

7 posted on 12/10/2006 6:59:29 AM PST by skyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: surfer

Very sad. Sounds like a close knit family who love one another. Thank God for the family and volunteers....without them they would have all died on that mountain.


8 posted on 12/10/2006 7:00:46 AM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surfer

Somebody help me out here: did Mr. Kim try to follow the road back out and lost his way, or did he try to hike cross-country?


9 posted on 12/10/2006 7:03:44 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

It is a tragic story, and yet not uncommon. My brother died in a similar accident. Having lived in the eastern Sierras (at 8000') for a number of years, I have to say -- I never knew about WEATHER. Cold, snow, ice, wind -- they are all huge forces that city people are protected from and do not understand. I walked home one evening in a blizzard -- maybe 1/2 mile at the most -- and wondered if I would make it.

This is such a sad story and yet, within it, there are such great heroes. The man who was reminded of his own granddaughters/ the cell phone guy who insisted that someone listen / the searchers -- what great heroes.

That family should be very proud of their husband/ son, who made a superhuman effort to get help. My heart goes out to them.


10 posted on 12/10/2006 7:05:03 AM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

He started back out the road, but eventually left it and followed a stream downhill.


11 posted on 12/10/2006 7:05:39 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: surfer
"A Portland hotel where the family had stayed refused to provide credit card records that might have indicated which way the Kims had gone."

And this is bad because....

Careful what you wish for. While the credit records may have helped here, there are plenty of good reasons why such documents should NOT be freely given to the government.

12 posted on 12/10/2006 7:07:40 AM PST by meyer (Bring back the Contract with America and you'll bring back the Republican majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Makes me think that there should be a person who listens to every tip, every bit of input that comes in. The man from the lodge saw the prints and nobody listened. The misunderstanding that he had cleared the road.

Plus the cell phone records of piings would have been invaluable.

Plus when driving thru mountains, you ought to check in with somebody every day.

So sad,,he almost made it if he had stayed put.


13 posted on 12/10/2006 7:10:22 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

I was struck by that too. I think those people out west have this kind of character,,an independent, taking action, doing the right thing and not waiting for someone to "help". It is admirable.


14 posted on 12/10/2006 7:12:34 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

From what I have pieced together. James Kim and his wife made a plan. James was going to follow the road back out and look for Rogue River - he knew if he followed Rogue river he would run into a town. They had estimated it to be about 4.5 miles away.

So it might be assumed that James saw the creek area and thought either it was Rogue River or was going to lead to it. An old survival tatic used to be to follow rivers because they ultimately alway led to a town. There are many theories on this now.


15 posted on 12/10/2006 7:13:13 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meyer

I think you are splitting hairs.

The family was missing, LE was looking for them. A stand on principle was insane in this case.


16 posted on 12/10/2006 7:14:44 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Funny how the one thing you pick out is what you are most paranoid about.

You completely missed the real important facts in the article...

Read about the lodge owner - if that doesn't drive you through the roof nothing will.

I don't think the credit card records (except for credit card number) would have helped anyway.

I don't think anybody here is wishing for open access to our information - however I am sure the Kim family wishes they had provided it. It is all about the perspective that you have.


17 posted on 12/10/2006 7:16:46 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meyer
credit card records that might have indicated which way the Kims had gone

I wonder how this would help?

18 posted on 12/10/2006 7:17:09 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (Why is the Viagra car in NASCAR a Ford and not a Stretch Limo?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

Yeah they used to call them cowboys! :) God Bless Them!


19 posted on 12/10/2006 7:17:33 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meyer
"While the credit records may have helped here, there are plenty of good reasons why such documents should NOT be freely given to the government."

Quite true. But there are also some good reasons why such documents should be given to authorities, under certain conditions. One of those reasons would be to save the credit card owner's life.

20 posted on 12/10/2006 7:18:17 AM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

If they had their credit card numbers they could trace any other transactions - like where they ate, where they bought gas, where they picked up that lousy map.

How many of us have told their relatives their credit card numbers?


21 posted on 12/10/2006 7:19:01 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
A month or two ago, while walking the dog, I noted what appears to be a leaking fire-hydrant. I also observed that, in places where the water had puddled, mold/mildew/green-stuff was forming (that should've been my tip-off).

Yesterday, while walking the dog, I noted a 4"-6" sheet of ice on that side of the street. So I called the Village to report. As for the people that actually live on that street, who the heck knows? As in this case, they probably assumed someone else called it in.

22 posted on 12/10/2006 7:19:37 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Portland police should have been requested to go the hotel and talk to the manager. My guess is the invoice would have had a record of phone calls the Kims made on the hotel land lines?
23 posted on 12/10/2006 7:22:00 AM PST by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: surfer

I understand the "follow the water" concept. I would not be very willing to head into a snowdrift to test it . . . of course, I wasn't there.


24 posted on 12/10/2006 7:22:10 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: surfer
That Rubrecht doesn't sound like a nice or competent person. Bet it sucks to be her.
25 posted on 12/10/2006 7:24:06 AM PST by mcshot ("If it ain't broke it doesn't have enough features." paraphrased anon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: surfer

I saw the chopper pilot who found the car based on his hunch and actual knowledge of the area. It is simply incredible that those responsible early on were unaware of the dead-end logging road and it's history of confusing people.


26 posted on 12/10/2006 7:24:31 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Well after 6 days without food and you just walked close to 10 miles on the road and you haven't found anything and the prospect of heading back to your family just to watch them die...I think would push anyone to solve the problem.

Ironically even though James died his efforts did lead to the rescue of his family - his footprints in the snow on the road.


27 posted on 12/10/2006 7:24:31 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

No doubt corporate policy requires legal approval before releasing any personal information to authorities. It's possible the manager even gave the credit card info to the police, but in order to protect his/her job asked them never to reveal that information publicly. That's what I would do once corporate refused to release the records.


28 posted on 12/10/2006 7:24:40 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: surfer
There are many things to be learned. For myself - though I will mostly be traveling I-5, I will carrying things that I would not have before this tragedy - even as we go into the mountains accompanied by locals.

And I certainly would like to know the hotel that refused to give info about a missing family.

29 posted on 12/10/2006 7:25:30 AM PST by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

You hit that one on the head.


30 posted on 12/10/2006 7:26:53 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
It is simply incredible that those responsible early on were unaware of the dead-end logging road and it's history of confusing people.

That is also somewhat perplexing. I wonder if the authorities knew about it, but couldn't get to the location.

31 posted on 12/10/2006 7:27:22 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: surfer
I read yesterday that there were bear tracks on the road. He might have been trying to avoid a bear when he left the road. I know that sometimes in the coastal mountains that bears don't hibernate in winter but I don't know if that would be the case here. I do know that city people who have no experience with the wild country have no idea what it would take to survive. This is so tragic. I am a city person but after years of hunting trips with my husband I have been educated in survival techniques.
32 posted on 12/10/2006 7:28:09 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mcshot
That Rubrecht doesn't sound like a nice or competent person. Bet it sucks to be her.

Agreed. The only mitigating factor is that she probably received hundreds of tips on the case, and it's tough to sift out the "good" ones. But when she met the guy face-to-face and was presented with his credentials, she should've taken some action.

If I were running the show, she would be reassigned to another less critical position given her lack of response.

33 posted on 12/10/2006 7:32:21 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: skyman

Broken gate.

I hope the ones who broke the gate has a conscious and it torments them.

If I were guessing, I think the ones who broke the gate were more than likely snowmobile riders. We have this problem here in the mountains of Tn.. The National Forest gates the roads due to traffic misuse by users. The dirt and gravel roads will not hold up in the winter months due to freezing thawing of the earth. Traffic use destroys the roads and, this a great expense to the tax payers money that funds the National Forest Service.


34 posted on 12/10/2006 7:32:28 AM PST by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: surfer

I posted the following on the earlier thread not knowing about this one.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It is amazing that when I have just about decided that this thread has run out of gas, you come up with something like that.

Before I get to the most important point, an observation about the credit card info.

There is really good reason for that under normal circumstances. People will get info on hotel guests and either knock over their home while they are gone or otherwise rip them off.

But I am sure that anyone above a desk clerk would have the authority and the judgment to break the rules in an emergency search and rescue situation. So I expect this was a low level employee afraid to do something he/she was told not to do.

So someone should have gone to the top person.

But that brings up another question. I have always understood that in a life threatening situation, a peace officer can commandeer a car, boat, whatever that is required to save a life or apprehend a dangerous person. That may not be correct and apprehending a computer that you can't figure out how to work (passwords, etc.) may not have been cost effective as relates to time.

And since we don't even know that the information would have helped, we can't say any more about that other than I would fire the person who refused the information under those circumstances.

But the part of this story that really hurts is the part about the guy that saw the car tracks and followed them until his snowmobile hit dry land.

He has to have some sleepless nights for the rest of his life.

Maybe he has a physical condition that does not allow it, but I would have gone back to the house and rounded up something that would go the rest of the way and I would have found out what was at the end of the tracks.

If not able to do that myself, I would have planted myself at the entrance to that road, that is, where it turned off of the main road, and raised a fuss until someone did go in.

Too many times people pick up the phone and make a call and then they are done. Most of the time that works but many times it does not because of the huge number of people, the various layers of command, shift changes and other things that cause information to be lost.

The "I thought you took care of that" causes a lot of mistakes, as well.

So my suggestion is that we should promise ourselves that should we ever be involved in anything like this and we see something that has such great significance that we do more than just make a phone call. If nothing happens after the first call, call again. If nothing happens, call another one of the agencies involved. If nothing happens after you call three times, call the TV station.
We all have "I should have's" on our conscience. I would hate to have this one.
That story is to me the saddest of them all.


35 posted on 12/10/2006 7:35:48 AM PST by woodbutcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: surfer

RE the credit card info refusal.....did they lose a day or so until the Denny's in Roseburg first identified them by description?


36 posted on 12/10/2006 7:37:38 AM PST by daybreakcoming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: buck61
Broken gate.

I hope the ones who broke the gate has a conscious and it torments them.

If I were guessing, I think the ones who broke the gate were more than likely snowmobile riders.

It is more likely hunters. That area is popular with the local hunters and from what I've read the snowpack was not that great so it was probably not snowmobilers.

37 posted on 12/10/2006 7:38:06 AM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: surfer
Someone posted a link a few days ago to a amateur video shot by someone headed to the location of the Kim's car after her rescue. It was taken by the passenger from inside as they traveled up to the turn off and when I saw it I said that I would have taken the same spur as it veered off to the right and down hill. It really looked like the prominent road. I hope someone can find that link...
38 posted on 12/10/2006 7:39:37 AM PST by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

The owner of that lodge that said he cleared the road certainly should be in trouble. The guy was covering up for the fact that a road on his property that should have been clearly marked as dangerous was not.


39 posted on 12/10/2006 7:40:15 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
The owner of that lodge that said he cleared the road certainly should be in trouble. The guy was covering up for the fact that a road on his property that should have been clearly marked as dangerous was not.

I don't know if you saw that a lock on a gate on that road had been cut by vandals.

The gate was not in place.

40 posted on 12/10/2006 7:42:16 AM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: surfer

You have a point about the gate, but I stand by the letter of my post. Having almost come to grief in similar circumstances, I would urge people facing such circumstances to evaluate the risks with the utmost seriousness. Even just delaying the trip through the mountains until the daylight hours probably would have saved James' life.


41 posted on 12/10/2006 7:44:21 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin
With the advent of the cordless Sawzall you are going to see more of this vandalism. If this spur led to the Rogue River it could have been fishermen looking for Steelhead or Salmon...
42 posted on 12/10/2006 7:48:07 AM PST by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

The owner of the lodge never said he cleared the road. In fact he was the one that was upset because they didn't clear the road effectively.

Also from what I understand they used to have signs directing people to the lodge but vandals did a lot of damage over the winters where they finally had to remove to the signs.

In addition the Kim's car was not 1 mile from the Bear Lake Lodge - LE incorrectly reported the position. They were close or over 7 miles away from the lodge.

Bottom line is the locals all knew this area was a problem and people have been lost in this same exact area. The shame here is no one is learning from past mistakes - they keep making them.

Also LE nor SAR didn't find any of the Kim's...the Kim's - all of them were found by private citizens. How is that possible?


43 posted on 12/10/2006 7:49:30 AM PST by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: skyman
It's easy to lay blame and pass judgement.

Not at all what I was doing. See my post #41. It's important to be clear about what the Kims could have done that might have saved James' life. Perhaps someone else might re-think their intention to do something similar, especially with two youngsters and a wife in the vehicle. This doesn't detract from his heroic effort to save his family.

44 posted on 12/10/2006 7:49:55 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: paulat

True, however this guy should have inspected his property more carefully. He knew a family was missing. Also, he told authorities he had 'cleared the road'. He had not. Perhaps, this family would have been saved had the owner not made that false claim. What do you think.


45 posted on 12/10/2006 7:50:02 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bboop
That family should be very proud of their husband/ son, who made a superhuman effort to get help. My heart goes out to them.

I feel the same way.

46 posted on 12/10/2006 7:51:58 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

When I lived out in Illinois. It was very very cold. We carried survival gear in the winter at all times and especially if we were travelling any distance. We had food, bottled water, blankets, flairs and extra clothes. Also, we had a first aid kit and some other stuff which I have forgotten. I know we had shovels (to keep the snow off the car).


47 posted on 12/10/2006 7:52:44 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
True, however this guy should have inspected his property more carefully. He knew a family was missing. Also, he told authorities he had 'cleared the road'. He had not. Perhaps, this family would have been saved had the owner not made that false claim. What do you think.

Very good point. I don't think people who own property can be 100% vigilant...but you are right, when alerted, they should check it out.

48 posted on 12/10/2006 7:53:32 AM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

I doubt if there is any private roads in that area. Those lodges could be on Forest Service land with a lease but even if they sit on deeded land the roads are Forest Service and BLM.


49 posted on 12/10/2006 7:53:58 AM PST by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Could be but a real popular area for fishermen (Rainy Falls) is just up the river from there and is just a short hike from the Merlin-Galice Rd. I've taken that hike more than a few times to watch the salmon jump up the falls. A few miles down from Rainy falls is the lodge that is off Bear Creek.


50 posted on 12/10/2006 7:55:30 AM PST by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson