Posted on 01/16/2007 5:11:53 AM PST by 7thson
Except that their view has nothing to do with "race" or ethnicity or heredity. It's a sense of entitlement to rule that is based on religion . Anybody who wants to can join simply by converting.
This is very different from the Spartan or Nazi view of things, where you have to be born into the "master race." You can't join up.
From a purely practical standpoint, a "master group" you can join is likely to defeat one based on heredity. Getting lots of your potential opponents to join your side makes a lot of sense. The Romans were really good at this, a major reason they conquered and ruled more of the ancient world than anybody else.
I highly recommend the book "Civilization and its Enemies" by Lee Harris. He discusses the Spartans at length and draws some interesting conclusions.
So which group were the Spartans in?
Leonidas hand picked the 300 because they were all FATHERS.
The men all left sons behind who would carry on the blood line of the brave men.
For those who don't know this is where we get the phrase MOLON LABE. (come get them) This was when the persians demanded the spartans surrender and leave their weapons behind. The spartan replied by saying come get them.
There is much MISinformation about the ancients (having studied the real deal in Greece). So be wary of folks who are too quick to view the ancient world with revisionist history lenses.
Well put.
It isn't a documentary, it's fiction. Based on true events, but fiction nonetheless.
you mean the "liberty kids" from PBS are not real! say it ain't so!
(/s)
In an officially declared war, printing battles plans for Iraq, telling the public about going after bank transactions, and our eavesdropping on terrorists phone calls falls more under treason than Freedom of Speech. Going to Iraq and holding hands with a terroristic dictator is also treasonous.
Would today's equivalent be "bring it on!"
I am not doing his argumnets justice. It's been three years since I read the book and I don't have a copy handy to refresh my memory.
None the less I suspect you would enjoy it.
Really I think it's over the top to associate "master race" ideology with Sparta. Sure, Spartans fought their share of wars, as all the Greek city states did. But I've never heard of them setting out to genocide another race in total.
I am 1/4 Spartan, I'll have to look into that.
The 300 is definitely not a remake of that (admittedly fine) film.
The effects could be better described as 'evocative' than 'fake'. Like Sin City, one of the design goals of this film is to capture a mythic reality, not a photographic one.
The Nazis did a lot of things besides genocide.
The specific Nazi practices I was thinking of with regard to the Spartans were state-controlled eugenics and enslavement of entire peoples for the enrichment of the master race.
While slavery in Greek societies was widespread, only Sparta enslaved entire cities and regions, then controlled them by declaring war on them each year so that they could be killed with religious impunity.
The Spartans also invented the idea of the "secret police" brought to its peak by the Gestapo. However, since this is a hallmark of all totalitarian states, there's nothing specifically Nazi about it.
Outstanding.
The Persian army was between 100,000 and 1,000,000 strong (I guess record keeping wasn't the best back then). If not for the demoralizing impact the 300 Spartans at Thermopylae had on the Persians, they would have likely overtaken the Greeks, and western culture would likely have perished.
The Battle of Tours with Martel had the same impact. If not for that battle, the west would likely have been destroyed by the east. It decided that the Christians and not Muslims would be the ruling power in Europe. Would America even have been settled if the muslims won? If it had, would it have been as free as it is/was?
Who were the Persians? Today we would say Iran and the surrounding area. Who did Martel defeat? The Moors and Muslims.
Who are we fighting today?
I look at the US (and parts of Canada, the UK, Australia, and Poland) as the 300. Even within the US, only a small part of us acknowledge that this really is a battle between the east and the west and which culture will survive. Hopefully, we can hold off the enemy long enough for our side to get organized and ready to fight.
Molon Labe!!!
Who are we fighting today?
"I look at the US (and parts of Canada, the UK, Australia, and Poland) as the 300. Even within the US, only a small part of us acknowledge that this really is a battle between the east and the west and which culture will survive. Hopefully, we can hold off the enemy long enough for our side to get organized and ready to fight.
Molon Labe!!!"
Mr.Nail, meet Mr.Hammer....
Somewhere one of the shields taken by the Athenians from a Spartan on the isle of Sphacteria, and so engraved. Had Athens been a multicameral democracy, instead of the mob-ocracy that it was, that battle might have ended the Peloponnesian War, and in any case, there wouldn't have been the expedition to Syracuse. Ah well, it worked out anyway, as Thebes destroyed what was left of the Spartan army at Leuctra. That monument remains (much reduced by earthquake and scavenging for building stone). Oh wait, it's a restoration. Still, some of it was still in situ. As you said, amazing.
http://www.sikyon.com/Thebes/leuctra_eg.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.