Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE "ILLEGAL sURRENDER", THAT'S WHAT THE BOTTOM LINE IS!
Jan. 22, 2007 | Concerned Citizen

Posted on 01/22/2007 10:48:38 AM PST by Tawkit

THE “ILLEGAL SURRENDER” THAT’S WHAT THE BOTTOM LINE IS!

Our politicians are contemplating the “illegal surrender” of the sovereignty of the United States of America to Mexico!

They know by legalizing the illegal aliens, the Mexican population will exceed the American people’s population in a matter of years! They have been told on the Senate floor by the Heritage Foundation and Senator Jeff Sessions.

Therefore by the politicians giving the illegal aliens citizenship and legal rights. The politicians are knowingly and willfully putting the Mexican people in the majority of the population of the U.S. and with their Votes, the Mexicans will come to be the Political Power of The United States!

If enacted the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIRA, S. 2611) would be the most dramatic change in immigration law in 80 years, allowing an estimated 103 million persons to legally immigrate to the U.S. over the next 20 years – fully one-third of the current population of the United States. http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1076.cfm

U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) today unveiled an impact analysis that shows the Senate immigration bill – should it become law – would permit up to 217.1 million new legal immigrants into the United States over the next 20 years, a number equal to 66 percent of the total current population. http://sessions.senate.gov/pressapp/record.cfm?id=255553&&

The politicians know the illegal aliens on a whole are costing the American taxpayers $BILLIONS$ of dollars right now! That’s breaking the backs of the middle class! By allowing the “North American Union” (NAU) to go through it will be the “illegal surrender” of the our Nations sovereignty to Mexico!

Is this Constitutional? Does this constitute Treason? Can we sue? Can we run with this idea?

I have heard in more that one, inaugural speech and political speech ,the Politicians saying, it’s their job as a politician to think 30 years in advance for the good of the Nation.

Our politicians can’t think past their noses! Or shall I say, They can’t think past the linings of their pockets!!!!!

Other Sources:

1. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroine and marijuana, crossed into the U. S. from the Southern border. Homeland Security Report: http://www.house.gov/mccaul/pdf/Investigaions-Border-Report.pdf

2. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services, paid by the American taxpayers. http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html

3. $200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

4. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services, paid by the American taxpayers. http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html

5. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin. http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/nation/15795654.htm?source=rss&channel=cctimes_nation

6. “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP) also known as “The North American Union” (NAU)

http://www.judicialwatch.org/5979.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_and_Prosperity_Partnership_of_North_America http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive/2005/Mar/23-20928.html


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigrantlist; immigrationissues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Ben Ficklin

"Wrong. I don't set the facts. I don't depend on FR for the facts."


OK, I'll bend. Please tell me where I, a common man, can get the REAL facts? BTW: I don't care what the RNC says or does. They have lost my support. I'm a Conservative not a repub.


21 posted on 01/23/2007 12:27:48 PM PST by wolfcreek (Please Lord, May I be, one who sees what's in front of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
The "real facts"?

This may be bad news for you. There is no one there to spoon feed the facts to you. Always beware of those that try to spoon feed you.

For example: After the Senate completed their bill last spring, Sessions sprang forth with info presented to the Judiciary Committee by an economist that said that illegals and legals drive down wages.

But, for those who didn't want to listen to Sessions' interpretation of the facts, the Judiciary Committee has a website where testimony from 5 economists could be read. Of course the other economists disagreed with the economist that Sessions was quoting. The degree to which wages are depressed is really small. Plus, the US has a bountiful safety net for low wage earners.

Add to this, Sessions' was taking statements from the economists testimony out of context. He was actually talking about how the low skill/low wage workers benefit in comparison to semi-skilled and high skilled. If you bring in a lot of low skilled workers the semi and high skilled workers will benefit relatvely more. Converely, if you bring in a lot of high skilled workers, the semi and low skilled workers would benefit relatvely more.

All this confirms the study done by the Dallas Fed Bank several years ago on the economic benefits of immigration to the SW US.

It is also in line with Greenspans concept of a robust labor supply as an inflation beater.

The good thing about the internet is that you or I can find out what we need to know. We don't have to rely on what Dan Rather or Senator Sessions tell us.

22 posted on 01/23/2007 1:17:57 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

"Always beware of those that try to spoon feed you."


You seem to have all the *REAL* facts, Ben. Should I be wary of you? You hardly ever answer a direct question and seem to have more of an agenda than most. You'd like for me and others to come around to your way of thinking but, you see, not everyone thinks illegal immigration, globalism or highways operated by foreign entities, is good for America.


Let's try this one more time. If laws regarding immigration, in place today, are not being enforced or adhered to, what would be the benefit of having a NEW comprehensive plan?


23 posted on 01/23/2007 1:47:03 PM PST by wolfcreek (Please Lord, May I be, one who sees what's in front of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
I wasn't trying to spoonfeed you. I was only trying to demonstrate to you that there no one place to go to get accurate info. I merely used that committee testimony as an example and how you can find other sources that corroborate that testimony.

Its a lot of work, and as an individual, you have to make choices on what issues you pursue.

24 posted on 01/23/2007 4:55:18 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson