North American Union Has Been in the Works All Along

JFPO ^ | February 22, 2007 | Jews For the Preservation of Firearms

[proudofthesouth]

In August of 2006, we warned our readership about the coming North American Union, a plan to merge Canada, Mexico and the US into a single economic and political entity a la the European Union. You can read our alert, "Another Back Door for Gun Control" here: http://www.jpfo.org/alert20060815.htm

At that time, the planned NAU was (supposedly) still a theory, one new harebrained scheme among so many others proposed by the government elite safely ensconced in their ivory towers. Disturbingly, that no longer appears to be the case.

According to a recent article in the New American ( http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_4468.shtml or http://tinyurl.com/2vlzt3 ), in 1998, four "North American" business schools teamed up to create the PanAmerican Partnership, a business-training program sponsoring training and research emphasizing North American economic integration, and dedicated to building "the next generation of North American managers.".........

[proudofthesouth]

The rest of the article is at the the website.

I feel so sorry for future generations. The great country that we grew up in is going to be destroyed.

Out gutless politicans are too power and money hungry to do anything against this coming tyranny. They no longer work FOR us.

[Nailbiter]

ping

[Cagey]

Press one for Spanish, two for French.

[Vanders9]

Well, if the USA dominates the new union (which of course it will do) you might end up with an even larger United States.

As for gun control, thats a good idea. No reason for private citizens to wander round with assault rifles.

Vanders9, utterer of heresy :)

[proudofthesouth]

"As for gun control, thats a good idea. No reason for private citizens to wander round with assault rifles."

You are being sarcastic about that comment aren't you?

[TomGuy]

Shortly after Clinton left the White House, both he and Madeline Albright went on the speech-i-fying circuit.

Clinton made one of his first speeches at Georgetown U (IIRC). I recall hearing portions of it. One striking comment was a warning Clinton made. Basically, it was that the US should play nice with 3rd world countries, as it would soon be on the same level as them.

Not long after, Albright made a similar comment in a speech she made. (IIRC, her speech was in some Caribbean location.)

At the time I heard their comments, I thought they were strange comments -- both cautioning, basically, that we now should be nice to 3rd world countries, because soon we would be one of them. I found it unsettling that both would speak about the not-to-distant the demise of the US as a great nation devolving into a 3rd world entity.

After 9-11-01, Bush continued to push for amnesty, and he continually failed to enforce border security and quell the flood of illegals. Yet, he was sending thousands to troops to Afghanistan and Iraq, many of those troops tasked with security border areas in those countries. The contradictory actions regarding borders seemed questionable. Why would Bush not place a premium on security the US borders, especially after 911?

Then some articles and comments showed up about SPP - Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP). Many call that tinfoil alarm; they were the same ones who called any concerns about the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) tinfoil alerts.

So, are the SPP and CFR concerns just tinfoil? If we just wait to see, it might be too late. SPP is supposed to be accomplished within the next 5 years -- wherein the NAU may take precedence over the various United States.

Tinfoil?

The Senate amnesty bill from last session had a provision sneaked in at the last moments in the Judiciary Committee. That provision mandated that Mexico be consulted on all Southern border issues. Doesn't that basically give up US sovereignty to a foreign government, if it is mandated that they be consulted on certain issues?

Strangely, the SPP is being pushed by the Administration, without the advice and consent of Congress.

Tinfoil? Let's hope. But if it isn't, we may find out too late. Of course, the Chamberlains are telling us to ignore all the goings on behind the curtain -- we will have peace in our time.

[TomGuy]

I feel so sorry for future generations.

And that is the not-to-distant future. the SPP and NAU are supposedly to be accomplished with 5 years (2012, IIRC).

If the next president is as open-borders as the current one, we won't have much of a strong nation left -- not with potentially upwards of 100 million illegals getting amnesty (those currently here and those coming in in the next few years).

[Kakaze]

Careful Tom, you're not supposed to notice whats going on here.

You should be mesmerized by Anna Nicole and Brittany , after all thats whats important , isn't it?

[TomGuy]

Well, if the USA dominates the new union (which of course it will do) you might end up with an even larger United States.

How will opening the nation to some 100 million poorly educated, low wage, consumers of taxpayer subsidies, be a benefit to the US as a nation? It won't. They will drain the resources. Who benefits? The relatively small wealthy class of Mexico, the US and Canada at the expense to the taxpayers.

The last estimate I saw from 2006 indicated that each illegal costs the US taxpayers around $89,000 in subsidized health, education, and social services. Multiply that times the potential number of illegals here and coming. One Congressional report from 2006 indicated that up to 10 million illegals entered just during the previous year. If true, that one year of illegals will end up straining our system at $890,000,000,000. Add in the various 3rd world diseases some are bringing in and straining the health care system. The future doesn't seem so rosey. Who do you think will be tasked with taking care of that other 50 or 75 million poor remaining in Mexico?

[RoadTest]

First the Clintons gave away our defense edge, then the Bushes gave away our country.

They ride around in golf carts together.

[rockinqsranch]

A number of years ago I was researching for some answers about Roades and discovered some eye opening revelations. I'm going to spend today retracing that which I found back when. Hopefully I can share something of value later on.

It all has to do with Roades and the C.F.R..

Most important question I want to find out is why an organization such as the CFR that has considerable influence in American Foriegn Policy is so extremely secretive. Some might say our Continental Congress was secretive, but then tyranny existed at the time. Ours is an open society, so why does a Society of British origin, Roades C.F.R. operate so secretively and influentially within our open Society? Why are we learning about so much sleight of hand governance through rumor?

This is our Government...WE ARE the Government in our society, or allegedly so. When did that all change?

[sergeantdave]

"As for gun control, thats a good idea."

Sounds like you're still pissed we drove the Tories into the sea. And how's your Marxist buddy "Red" Ken?

[Recon Dad]

Vanders9, utterer of heresy :)

Opinions are like hemorrhoids..........every assh**le has one.

[TomGuy]

You should be mesmerized by Anna Nicole and Brittany , after all thats whats important , isn't it?

Dang!

As soon as I hear Nichole on FoxNews, and I turn the TV off.

I need to get to retraining camp! [Maybe I can check in and out, in and out, in and out, like Britney at rehab -- and be on the all-day news alerts.]

LOL

[FoxNews has mentioned both Nichole and Britney this morning and my TV has learned to shut itself off.]

[knarf]

No Tom, it's not tin foil ... it is the sad legacy Americans, since at least the '30's, have been unwittingly (until recently) gearing towards a future that, sadly ... is pretty close to now.

I woke up this morning and my kids had fallen asleep in the living room with TV on ... I caught the last 10 minutes or so of the movie "Silver Streak" and was reminded (by the photography and SFX) of the kinetic energy a large, powerful, and out-of-control, speeding monster, with the momentum of miles at full throttle can develope ... and the resulting destruction upon impact.

At the time of the American Revolution, there was sufficient desire for individula liberty and freedom that they actually got off their asses and formed up to pull the trigger at the encroaching Goliath of servatude to King George.

We're in a much more subdued and P.C.'d (or P.W.'d as some might say) level of social structure that, I'm afraid ... very afraid ... there may no longer be a sufficient number of freedom loving men with the will to kill that could collectively and re-claim our God given heritage.

The scriptures speak clearly, in Matthew, chapter 21 ... That a nation that has been entrusted with the Gospel of Jesus, and refuses to protect it ... it will be given toi another ....

"Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof."

So, for the sake of instant gratification, we have sacrificed the blessings of the eternal on the altar of right now.

God gave us politics and the guidelines for politicians ... by trying to take the helm ourselves, we've lost control and are in a storm ... a 'perfect' storm, if you will ... that will (as in the movie), leave us alive, conscious and discussing the what was and how could its, right up til the end.

God asks only ... If My people, which are called by My name shall humble themselves ....

I pray we do not look up one day and see 'Ichabod' written over the stars and stripes.

[winodog]

Ping to read later, although this is one of the topics many will just ignore.

[BnBlFlag]

Good post. Sad but true. I mentioned this on another thread and was told by many to get my tin foil hat off. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

[trickyricky]

"I feel so sorry for future generations."

The globalists like "our" own GW think that their quest for a "New World Order" is a nobel one.

They've accomplished step one - Global Economy.

They will probably accomplish step two - Global Government,
in our children's lifetimes.

Then we will have a world without war, marching hand in hand into our brave new world.

The last chapter of THE book says otherwise, but they don't read THAT book.

So they WILL get their one world government, that is certain.

[bill1952]

Yeah, I guess the English are still pissed about that whole idea about private citizens being armed and all...

[bill1952]

you forgot fiercely socialist in that description.