| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/08/2007 12:03:14 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Continuing discussion: |
Posted on 03/09/2007 8:53:08 PM PST by mom4kittys
Edited on 03/09/2007 9:36:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
VAN SUSTEREN: Ron, let me square this up a little bit. Do you still represent only the estate of Anna Nicole and Jim represents Howard K. Stern, or are you also now representing Howard K. Stern?
RALE: Greta, I have never represented Howard. I represented Anna. And I'm kind of in limbo-land, where these courts in different jurisdictions are wanting to hear from me kind of as a friend of the court. But I am a successor executor of Anna's estate, and maybe at some point, I may be called in to play in that capacity. But I don't represent Howard. Howard's a friend of mine and — but I've not represented him in any of these proceedings so far.
VAN SUSTEREN: Jim, I imagine this litigation is tough on your client.
NEAVITT: Yes, I mean, I — I deal with the legal parts of it, and Ron actually has the personal contact with Howard. They're friends. And you know, it is a difficult thing for him. He'd like to get this thing over with. And Ron can tell you about the attempts he's made in good faith to get this litigation over and get it resolved immediately.
VAN SUSTEREN: Well, let me ask the question, then, that I'm sort of leading up to. It's a very simple one. The pain of this whole litigation between Larry Birkhead and Howard K. Stern on the issue of paternity is so easily done if they simply agree to have that baby tested for DNA. Ron, why not do that and forget all this discussion of settlement or litigation or whatever, just test the baby?
RALE: I mean, Greta, I think that we discussed this after your last show that I was on. But you know, forget about what happened prior to Anna Nicole's death. Unfortunately, you know, I had — well, we discussed this. You know, I had stopped the test on January 23, but...
VAN SUSTEREN: But why not — let me...
RALE: ... after Anna Nicole...
VAN SUSTEREN: But just why not just do the test? It's been...
RALE: Right. I mean...
(CROSSTALK)
VAN SUSTEREN: ... we are at a kidnapping (ph) point, maybe. Maybe it's a kidnapping point.
RALE: It's very simple. Either you're talking settlement or you're talking court. In Florida...
VAN SUSTEREN: No, it's not. That's not true. You just — you know what you could do, all of you? You could simply — because the baby can't leave the Bahamas, it's under a court order, is you could simply invite an expert. You could agree on an expert, you and Debra Opri and Larry Birkhead and Howard, bring the expert down, do a swab of the baby's cheek under standard conditions and do a DNA test, and it's over.
RALE: There are no settlement discussions. Debra Opri — you can talk to her yourself...
VAN SUSTEREN: I'm not talking settlement.
RALE: She said that...
VAN SUSTEREN: She wouldn't agree to that...
RALE: Well, how are you going to facilitate this? You have to facilitate it. Either you're talking settlement or you're talking court.
NEAVITT: Right.
RALE: If we're talking settlement, she's nixed that. She says that's not going to happen. It would have happened in Florida. They were talking. I'm not going to divulge what was the nature of their settlement discussions. That's privileged. But the parties were talking. They booted me out of my hotel room. They were talking. I didn't even know they were coming. I was — I had my pants on, left the room, OK? But they were talking settlement.
The next day, we're having a hearing in Florida. I told Debra Opri, I said, Look, these guys want to talk settlement. Let's get out of the picture. She said, Oh, fine, we're not doing anything at this hearing other than collecting Anna's DNA that was, you know, taken from Anna.
VAN SUSTEREN: But Ron — all right, let me...
RALE: But then, sure enough...
VAN SUSTEREN: Wouldn't your friend and Jim's client agree to this: A swab is done of that child in a standard lab that you both agree on, and if that swab turns out that the DNA is consistent with the DNA of Larry Birkhead, that the child simply be turned over to the natural father of the child of 6 months old? Would your client agree to that?
NEAVITT: Greta, if you want to mediate between Debra Opri and us and have a settlement conference, I'm sure that would work. I've...
VAN SUSTEREN: Is — is that something you would agree to?
NEAVITT: As of today, I walked up to her...
(CROSSTALK)
NEAVITT: ... sit down and try to settle this case. There's two ways to deal with it. Either sit down and settle, or let's go to court.
RALE: And Greta, you have to remember...
VAN SUSTEREN: All right. Would you agree to that? Because I'm going to have Debra Opri on in a second, and I'll ask her. Would you agree to that?
NEAVITT: To sit down with her and you and let's try to settle this case?
VAN SUSTEREN: No. No, no.
NEAVITT: Yes.
VAN SUSTEREN: No, would you agree to picking a standard lab, doing a DNA swab, if the DNA turns out to be Larry's, the baby gets turned over to Larry immediately. If it turns out to be Howard, Howard keeps the baby.
RALE: Let's talk — you know, if we're going to talk turkey about settlement, let's talk about it this way. We've had hearings basically every week since Anna Nicole passed away. They've got to push off their hearings. If they're going to put a gun to our head and say, You're going to court...
(CROSSTALK)
VAN SUSTEREN: It's in the best interests of the child
RALE: ... how are we going to sit down to the — it's like sitting down at a table with terrorists. You got to...
(CROSSTALK)
VAN SUSTEREN: But wait a second, Ron — Ron, all we want to do — all anyone wants to do, whether it's viewers, judges, anybody, is to determine the father of that child. That child is 6 months old.
RALE: Right. Greta, it's...
VAN SUSTEREN: And a DNA test...
RALE: ... so simple...
VAN SUSTEREN: ... will do that.
RALE: It's so simple. Greta, I hate to, you know, talk over you, but it's so simple. In your practice of law, when you practiced law, I don't know if you were on the civil side, but if you're going to talk settlement, in my 19 years — it's been 19 years — you know, if the parties are going to settle, you push off the litigation. You don't sit there and try to talk settlement with a gun to your head.
VAN SUSTEREN: You know...
RALE: You push off the litigation...
VAN SUSTEREN: You know what, though?
RALE: ... and then we talk. If they want to go to court...
VAN SUSTEREN: You don't even have to — you don't even need...
RALE: ... it's a different story.
VAN SUSTEREN: You don't even need Debra Opri or anybody.
RALE: But you go to understand...
VAN SUSTEREN: You can first go make the determination of whether your client is the father or not.
RALE: There's a lot more to it.
VAN SUSTEREN: If your client...
RALE: Greta...
VAN SUSTEREN: If your client...
RALE: Greta, there's a lot more to it than...
VAN SUSTEREN: If your client's not the father...
RALE: Greta, there's so much more to it. When you're going to talk settlement, there are so many issues involved. It's not just who's the biological father. There's so many issues involved. And if you want to talk settlement...
VAN SUSTEREN: Like what?
RALE: ... if you're serious, then you push off...
VAN SUSTEREN: What other issues?
RALE: ... court hearings. You push off court hearings. I'm not going to go through...
VAN SUSTEREN: What are the other issues?
RALE: ... them. We don't have time to talk about it.
VAN SUSTEREN: There is no other issue.
RALE: There's issues — no — well, you don't know that much about paternity.
NEAVITT: Safety of the child.
RALE: Paternity is more than just the biological father, and if you want to...
VAN SUSTEREN: If that — if Larry Birkhead is the father, then Larry Birkhead has all the financial responsibility for that child, takes all the responsibilities of that child. It's — I mean, it isn't that complicated.
RALE: Greta, you probably haven't practiced in the area of family law, but there's more to it than just who's the biological father. And if you're going to talk settlement, you need time to lay all the issues on the table. It could be — in one day — it could be a couple days. But you certainly can't do it when you have deadlines, court filings and all of that going on. It's bad blood. Nobody does that. In my experience, when you're talking settlement and if the parties want to talk, they talk. Get the lawyers out of it. There should be no reason why the parties can't get together.
In fact, there is a letter from Larry's Bahamian counsel to Howard's Bahamian counsel saying, You better not contact my client at all. Debra Opri is going to get on here and say, well, you know, Howard's a lawyer and Larry's not. But that's a bunch of nonsense because...
VAN SUSTEREN: She's tough. Look, I...
RALE: ... ultimately, the lawyers — the lawyers have to sanction the final settlement. Let the parties talk. We shouldn't be there. There shouldn't be lawyers involved.
VAN SUSTEREN: And I will say...
RALE: I don't care what you say.
VAN SUSTEREN: And I will say, Ron, I know Debra. and she's coming up soon. She's probably here. I know she's tough to deal with, and I'm going to give her an equally a hard time.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258695,00.html
I think getting HKS DNA sample was another tactic to box him in and force the paternity issue.
Yes, the longer it goes - the more he owes.
No one in this mess is assured of the millions talked about, though. HKS is the one with the 'death income' right now and LB seems to live modestly and has spent a lot of time and probably money seeking custody. I can't believe Opri is looking with a longing eye at monthly installments from LB.
For some reason my eye caught Larry when they were in front of the courthouse in LA the other day. Opri was her usual verbose self and he would put his hand out as if to say stop it and he looked really uncomfortable.
Larry also may have given in to Stern and gave him the rights to ANS likeness etc which is all he wants =$$$$
Larry just wants the baby {{{{I hope}}}} Please don't let him disappoint us.
Things that make you go humm-just put Fox on.
All things considered, the court should take exception to their stupid "who's yo daddie" law, and realize there is over 400 million dollars attached to this child.
I could scream from frustration..
sw
WOW! I didn't see that coming. Are the autopsy reports coming out today? (finally?)
I could wring the Bahamian lawyer Ian Cargill's neck right now.
For example, when Larry Birkhead’s attorney’s filed papers in the Bahamian court months ago seeking enforcement of an order from a California court for Anna Nicole to provide DNA saliva samples from herself and Dannielynn to establish paternity, presiding Justice Stephen Isaacs should have ordered her to comply forthwith. And let me hasten to clarify that he should have done so not to genuflect to the California court; but rather to honour the letter and spirit of Bahamian law.
Did the CA judge have authority to order Anna and the baby back to the states to take the DNA test? And if so, it's too bad she died before that could be done.
And am I wrong, or has Court not reported the Birkhead/Opri split yet?
Maybe Larry Birkhead will eventually have to strike a deal with Howard, as much as we don't like it. IOW's take the path of the least resistance.
PS, was this paternity "law" in the Bahamas passed BEFORE DNA tests were invented?
sw
sw
Thank you for the Methadone in the fridge clarification. I see where they're going with it.
Watch this line...last night on Greta some blond lawyer gal for Stern said basically the same thing. They are trying to establish the case that HKS is the only father the baby has known, that he has cared for her, etc. This is the new tact.
On the Opri issue...maybe they did have DNA testing done on something from Dannielynn when Burkhead visited her and now they are separating from eachother so that Opri isn't connected with something that may be considered less than ethical.
Just a thought....
They keep saying the Bahamas law is based on British Commmon Law. So, they're telling me that paternity testing is not done in Great Britain?
That's a good question about paternity/DNA in the Bahamas.
Unfortunately I'm off to work.....I will be watching the news from there.
I personally feel Larry is desperate to get the baby out of that hell hole and I don't blame him. He could give Howard the moon and the stars at this point in exchange for the baby.
FoxNews has reported it...Opri apparently issued a statement.
Thanks! Greta got a little frustrated.
Possibly if LB strikes a deal, once he has custody and proves he is the father, he will be able to lobby for Dannielynn to be given rights to ANS's image, name, etc. and leave HKS with nothing.
We can hope.
How many children in the Bahamas don't know who their biological father really is, because of this law?
And for the sake of a "medical history" alone, they should know .
sw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.