I think when someone is repeated what I, myself, have seen in articles, read in legislation, read what’s in Mexican government documents, Canadian documents, along with a vast array of other articles which are adding onto that information because of the FOIA act.....I’m saying there’s the ability to understand and comprehend whether or not an article is in or out of context.
How can you do that if you don’t reading anything but articles?
So it’s a matter of context? That’s quite a low standard. Here you have an author, a professor of political science, and he expects his work to avoid scrutiny . . . and when it’s scrutinized the argument shifts to matters of context.