Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gay State Conservative

It’s still a life they’re saving. If there are no humans inside, they still have to fight the fire and try to protect the structure anyway - so if the animals are there cowering in a corner (usually what happens), it’s usually little additional risk to evacuate the animals anyway.


13 posted on 08/23/2007 12:38:23 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr
It’s still a life they’re saving.

Last night I watched a portion of a documentary on the WTC collapse.In this film were still images of firemen walking up the stairs as civilians walked down.I'm sure you've seen them.One such image showed a firemen sweating profusely with a look of dread on his face,being clearly aware that he might not have much longer to live.Are you *honestly* telling me that if it had been 2,000 cats trapped on the 90th floor instead of 2,000 humans you would expect that firemen to make that same walk to his all-but-certain death?

If there are no humans inside, they still have to fight the fire and try to protect the structure anyway,

If the house is empty they can,and should,fight the fire from outside with hoses.The only time a fireman should go into a burning structure is when failure to do so would surely...or possibly...endanger *human* lives.

17 posted on 08/23/2007 1:18:01 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson