he’s changing dates, because most of his story is as tall as Paul Bunyan - he can’t remember what he’s said and tells different versions for different times
his original version of his meeting ANS in 2003, was she was ‘cold and distant’ and not interested in him - blew him off basically - that was changed in Feb to she was ‘heavy’ (fat) and he was the one who wasn’t interested - by 2004 she had ‘slimmed down’ he says
his original version of the pregnancy was that it was unplanned, and he didnt want her pregnant until she got off the drugs - that was changed in Oct after he hired Opri to a well=planned pregnancy not once, but twice (jan 2005/jan 2006)
i could go on and on and on lolol
Sod - i read your comment end of last thread about research or comments posted here showing up on other boards and being attributed to another author; rte66 has also noticed this
I’ve noticed on this board that when a ‘comment’ is taken, the posters here, for the most part at least, are nice enough to attribute the site it came from, if not the specific poster. It’s too bad the other sites don’t do the same for us, taking into consideration that apparently some people post at more than one board anyway.
I’ve ocassionally checked out some other boards as they are mentioned here, but I only post on this one because: one) there are consistently more people who are ‘current’ on what’s going on, and less of bringing others ‘up to speed’ just to keep things going, and, two) are less strictly-legal types who want only legal arguments and no speculation at all.
I really don’t care if anything I post shows up here or elsewhere under someone elses name - (won’t be the first time I’ve seen it happen), because what I, personally want, is to get the information out the best way I can, and if someone copies it, well, at least it’s out there, you know? Sometimes I may get it wrong, but sometimes
I can see some things that aren’t noticeable at first - like the neosporin, or the particular bacteria ANS was injected with and how rare it really is, or a discrepancy between this statement and that statement, etc. Knowing that topic-specific boards ARE monitored for just such ‘wait-a-minute’ revelations, it’s simply my own way of quietly and annonymously helping without profiting in any way, so if what I post gets repeated here or elsewhere, good deal.
that said, there are others who would like to be, and should be, recognized for their research (and there’s no problem with that either) and for them, it would be nice to see other boards (or posters who go from here to posting elsewhere and back again) at least acknowledge the intelligent and extensive research others have accomplished on this FreeRepublic thread and mention it as THEIR source once in a while - it’s only polite, after all.
Well, that’s my two cents anyway :)