To: Boston Blackie
Colts are gonna whip em good if it ever comes to it, so no worries...;-)
2 posted on
10/24/2007 11:09:47 AM PDT by
EnigmaticAnomaly
(Grassroots Conservatism at its finest...VOTE DUNCAN HUNTER 2008)
To: Boston Blackie
Sounds like Easterbrook lost a bundle betting against the Pats... whining simp.
3 posted on
10/24/2007 11:11:43 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. "What happens if neutrinos have mass?")
To: Boston Blackie
Blah,Blah,Blah.........
Pats win by 21.
4 posted on
10/24/2007 11:13:07 AM PDT by
GQuagmire
(Giggety,Giggety,Giggety)
To: Boston Blackie
Brady's face reminds one of Dick Cheney; people who smirk are fairly broadcasting the message, "I'm hiding something." He forgot to mention "the cheap shot"
6 posted on
10/24/2007 11:14:23 AM PDT by
clamper1797
(Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government if and when it deserves it)
To: Boston Blackie
That constant smirk on Brady's face reminds one of Dick Cheney; people who smirk are fairly broadcasting the message, "I'm hiding something."Well, I guess we know which side of the bed this guy wakes up on.
7 posted on
10/24/2007 11:14:49 AM PDT by
shekkian
To: mainepatsfan
That delusional S.O.B. Easterbrook should seek professional help.
Funny how he forgets that his All American boy Peyton settled a sexual harassment lawsuit out of court.
He compares Brady to Cheney but doesn't see a connection between Manning and that sexual predator Clinton.
To: Boston Blackie
This is a phony article! Good isn’t playing since the Cowboys aren’t playing!
9 posted on
10/24/2007 11:16:39 AM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: Boston Blackie
The obligatory Pats fans don’t like being called “The Evil Empire” apparently...;-) Although I tend to favor any report that glorifies the Colts and denigrates the Pats, I see your point folks. Not sure I agree the Pats will win by 22 points though. MAYBE 7 points. And that’s IF they win...;-)
13 posted on
10/24/2007 11:20:03 AM PDT by
EnigmaticAnomaly
(Grassroots Conservatism at its finest...VOTE DUNCAN HUNTER 2008)
To: Boston Blackie
Something puzzles the mind here.
If someone has a video camera on the sidelines aimed at the opposing team, how can the information be used in a timely manner?
Is it more useful as a tool of distraction to get into the opposing team's heads (a certain NFL head coach has been known to do this to his opponents) or can it actually have some dynamic benefit in the 15-20 seconds between the signals being given and the play starting?
If it can have some benefit in that limited time, why bother with a camera and slow down the decision making further?
15 posted on
10/24/2007 11:20:40 AM PDT by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
To: Boston Blackie
I don’t have much of an opinion on the arguments the article sets forth, but having endured—I mean—watched Pats games several times this yr, I have uncovered the key to victory against them. Put your best CB on Welker in the slot (Dallas would have done this with Newman had the other starting CB, Henry, been available), dbl team Moss, and take your chances with single coverage on Stallworth, who is pretty good WR, though not spectacular by any means. Pats running game is barely avg so not much to worry about there. They will still put up 3-4 TDs but a very good offense should be able to exploit their D for at least 3-4 TDs. So it can come down to a FG. That’s how the Colts will beat them in a couple weeks.
19 posted on
10/24/2007 11:29:14 AM PDT by
Dysart
(Temporarily Unavailable)
To: Boston Blackie
This beyotch got called to account by the ESPN ombusdman for his crappy journalistic standards two weeks ago. The filming violation is seriously old news. With the way that the Pat’s have blasted every defense they have played this year it hardly seems like they got that much benefit from it.
27 posted on
10/24/2007 11:39:24 AM PDT by
misterrob
(Seven down, 12 more til the Pats win the SB again.)
To: Boston Blackie
WTF? Somebody actually pays this Assclown to write this stuff?
31 posted on
10/24/2007 11:46:35 AM PDT by
mowowie
To: Boston Blackie
What a whiner. And a sissy, no doubt. :)
33 posted on
10/24/2007 11:48:37 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Boston Blackie
Wow, this Buttmunch has over 3700 comments ripping him apart.
44 posted on
10/24/2007 12:20:57 PM PDT by
mowowie
To: Boston Blackie
The team's star, Tom Brady, is a smirking sybarite who dates actresses and supermodels but whose public charity appearances are infrequent. That constant smirk on Brady's face reminds one of Dick Cheney; people who smirk are fairly broadcasting the message, "I'm hiding something."..... Ladies and gentlemen, representing Evil, the New England Patriots. Just had to get a dig in against the the Bush administration, in a sports article, no less, insinuating that the Bush administration is evil, like the Patriots.
51 posted on
10/24/2007 7:15:05 PM PDT by
rawhide
To: Boston Blackie
That constant smirk on Brady's face reminds one of Dick Cheney It's a career move. Attacking Republicans at Disney is never going to hurt you, and will likely get you noticed in a positive way. Ask the loathsome Keith Olbermann.
59 posted on
10/25/2007 8:36:49 AM PDT by
denydenydeny
(Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
To: Boston Blackie
Dishonesty, cheating, arrogance, hubris, endless complaining even in success. The Patriots have three Super Bowl rings, but that jewelry is tarnished by their cheating scandal.
Oh, my word - - this guy must have been betting against the Pats all year.
LOL!
80 posted on
10/28/2007 11:52:33 PM PDT by
Beckwith
(dhimmicrats and the liberal media have .chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson