Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jack Carter: What Really Happened at Minot AFB
Project Camelot ^ | 11-23-07 | Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy

Posted on 11/30/2007 2:03:06 PM PST by Renfield

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: tlb

Well, that all explains the Star Trek series Enterprise plot line for The Temporal Cold War.


41 posted on 12/01/2007 9:06:01 AM PST by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Bravo 21 Nevada Test Site aka NTS.......hundreds of above ground nuclear test’s in the 50’s & 60’s ......... (I feel fine...cough, hack, scratch, sneeze.....)


42 posted on 12/01/2007 8:29:02 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

There is a great deal of hyperbole in Jack Carter’s commentary that is incorrect and affects his credibility.
First, the nuclear winter prediction is vastly inaccurate.
Fission-based weapons produce a lot of radioactive fallout.
Fusion-based weapons do produce some radioactive fallout but far less in comparison to their yield. The blast effect is the primary objective of these weapons. The resultant dust produced from a large thermonuclear blast is quite small in comparison to even a minor volcanic eruption.
Second, the “death count” he alludes to, but does not give details on, is a commonly used practice to arouse alarm and lend credibility to his narrative. The details are removed to prevent the curious from authenticating his account. This method allows the writer to imply to the reader that his own safety is in jeopardy if the facts become known.
If people are indeed being killed by some US government entity then more details need to be produced. If Jack has credible evidence that proves witnesses are being silenced via murder, and fears for his own personal safety, then he should report this through the proper chain of command for whistle blowers. If he doesn’t trust, or is afraid, to use the proper “whistle” channel to avoid revealing his identity then why does he go public at all. Email is extremely easily traced to its originator with the proper IT tools.
Third, the is no physical way for the Chinese, or anyone else, to hack into the US internal command and control network. It is completely secure; beyond breach.
Finally, any UFO comment made in the context of discussion of nuclear weapons mishandling totally voids the author’s credibility.


43 posted on 12/02/2007 11:07:11 AM PST by Principled-One (Following the principles reveals the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson