The one the media seems to fear the most is Mitt. Another reason why I support him plus the fact that he has a spectacular record of administrative accomplishment. Completely turning around the corruption plagued Salt Lake City Winter Olympics was a huge plus.
I like to step back and look at all the candidates with eyes unencumbered by personal feelings. Mitt has always been THE candidate who comes out on top. Aside from his religion - and remember, we’re not electing a minister - this guy is clean, competent, qualified and credentialed.
Accept Mitt as the Republican nominee. It is our destiny.
On a lighter note, Mitt has hair and, he’s handsome, thus insuring the female and Homo vote...
But, don’t get me wrong. My real pick is Fred. But Fred is Fred. Too little too late...
I think he can carry Utah too. ;-)
Agree!
“I support him plus the fact that he has a spectacular record of administrative accomplishment. Completely turning around the corruption plagued Salt Lake City Winter Olympics was a huge plus.”
It could be pointed out that Rudy ran NYC, more corrupt than
the utah olympics.
Perot ran EDS, bigger than Bain Capital.
Bloomberg started ... well, I think you see the point.
Olympics = good accomplishment. Not the Presidency. Nor do
business guys tend to do well when they can’t decree what
will happen.
Administrative accomplishment is not the same as Visionary
accomplishment. I’m much prefer a candidate who is a visionary
leader to a one who is an administrator... but then, it doesn’t
appear we will get a visionary leader in this election.