http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,319425,00.html
Posted on 01/02/2008 10:14:03 AM PST by Perdogg
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,319425,00.html
Next time read the script before taking a role. Of course when you are passed out drunk half the time, that might be too much to ask.
Why bother to discuss her and the other twits?
I don’t find self destruction entertaining.
There are other articles on FR to read.
She is easy on the eyes though.
I can perfectly well understand that.
I have one of those myself. My girls and I call him “He who cannot be spoken about” when Daddy is home.
Why bother to discuss her and the other twits?
___________
Did you ask yourself that question prior to discussing her and the other twits?
I’ll never, ever understand the ‘This thread is beneath me and my intellect’ crowd, who, like yourself, feel compelled to tell us how worthless the thread is by posting on it. It’s funny, actually.
Drunk and easy on the eyes! I LIKE!
And just think of the opportunities for antibiotic use!
A walking petri dish, but latex helps...
I, for one, am above even discussing those who feel that these threads are beneath them.
What gets me are the folks who post to a thread just to say, “Yawn.”
LOL!!
Why bother to discuss her and the other twits?
Ask yourself that question because thats what you are doing right now.
No, just trying to discourage trashing up FR with non news.
I’ll never, ever understand the ‘This thread is beneath me and my intellect’ crowd, who, like yourself, feel compelled to tell us how worthless the thread is by posting on it. It’s funny, actually.
It’s bad enough we have Hillary and other nitwits to discuss. This one doesn’t need attention. I feel “compelled” to limit the trash that is discussed here. I’m hoping you and others might raise their standards on what is worth discussing and what is not. Clearly this one is in self destruct mode - hardly entertaining or worth “discussing”. Then again, some folks feel superior when they “discuss” train wrecks. For others it brings out their dismal sex life as they fantasize that she’s roll in the hay for them.
Oh well ... maybe some NEED to “discuss” this trash - it makes em feel better about themselves ... .
No but I read it now.
I probably will vote for Fred. I just wish he’s get fired up. His approach isn’t working ... it’s killing him. I do find the election to be very important.
Your heart is in the right place but your head is, uh, well, not so much.
How does commenting on the trashiness of a thread do anything to limit its discussion? It added to the discussion, a far cry from what you had hoped.
Folks here will discuss and comment on anything that passes through the mods. If it passes through the mods, then the thread has JimRob’s de facto approval. He can pull or have pulled any thread he chooses.
You want a site that discusses only things you find worthy of discussion, create your own blog. Moderate it to within an inch of its life.
I think most people posting on the ‘trashy’ threads are not feeling superior, or fantasizing about sex, they are using the opportunity to flex their sense of humor muscle - and in this not-so-funny world we live in, I say Rock On!!
Cheers, nmh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.