Never had Sprint.
Now I know why.
On a business standpoint, there could be a hidden clause there that binds you like any other 2 year contract...
BUT on a decency and human standpoint, this shouldnt even be an issue! Is Sprint that profit hungry that 1 person they couldn;t let go due to extraordinary circumstance?
It did come up that had he had a recent phone upgrade, that phone would have to be returned to Verizon, or otherwise transfered to an active customer with the requisite contract obligation.
I’m not sure what is the problem here - this was the same offer given to the family, they even offered a reduced plan - return the phone, accept the offered plan, or transfer the phone to someone who will pick up the contract.
How are they going to enforce a contract with a dead guy?
Although I can understand the phone company requesting a copy of a death certificate.
I can understand that...just send them copy of his death certificate, and pay his current monthly bill. If that doesn't satisfy them, then there is a problem.
It is no worse than the death tax or having to pay income tax for the year the breadwinner dies.
And this is another reason why one should make/procure multiple copies of the death certificate when a loved one dies. It is standard procedure.