Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur; smug
They fired on more than one ship before that, yet no cause for war.

If I understand the conventions correctly, a ship could be fired upon without it automatically being considered an act of war. The attack and conquest of a military post flying the US flag was viewed entirely differently than ineffectively shooting at a ship.

83 posted on 03/30/2008 11:09:53 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
The one thing I have never understood and have not found an explanation for, is the firing on the (forgot the name) a merchant ship carrying ice? I am sure several ice houses were waiting on that ice.
84 posted on 03/30/2008 11:16:23 AM PDT by smug (smug for President; Your only real hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson