Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
But this woman was in her 30s in a position of some responsibility with presumably at least 10 years' service under her belt.

According to one artilce I read, she has 19 years of service. I'm sure this includes her enlisted time.

19 posted on 04/11/2008 7:44:10 AM PDT by Perseverando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Perseverando
According to one artilce I read, she has 19 years of service. I'm sure this includes her enlisted time.

And she was hooking two years ago, so she presumably had 17 years of service at that time - making her 34 at the absolute youngest when she stopped hooking, but likely close to 40.

26 posted on 04/11/2008 7:48:08 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando

Navy Times confirms she is 38 years of age now, which means she was hooking when she was 35 and 36.


34 posted on 04/11/2008 7:51:31 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Perseverando
According to one artilce I read, she has 19 years of service. I'm sure this includes her enlisted time.

Not necessarily. If she was passed over for promotion to commander she could have 19 year in and be forced to retire at 20.

35 posted on 04/11/2008 7:52:09 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson