Posted on 04/13/2008 5:17:21 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Yeah. A little bloodied up.
Is it too much to ask that your provide supporting evidence for any of your claims?
Can I take it then that you didn't like the review I posted? Or did you even read it before going off on an entirely unrelated rant about the presumed sexual orientation of the editor of the magazine? Is that what passes for research among creationists, or is it just you?
Whatever. Here's another review for you to ignore. And don't bother to enlighten me on the sexual orientation of the editor or author. It doesn't matter as much to me as it obviously does to you.
Indeed, one would have to be pretty lame to deny there is some sort of deep connection between the two, after, say, reviewing the notes on my FR homepage.
Darwinism gone mad, but Darwinism nonetheless.
I don't agree that eugenics is darwinism gone mad. What makes eugenics plausible is the Darwinian notion of heredity. That is, anything you imagine can be inherited or passed along to offspring. Darwin even thought that the 'progress of America' was a germinal trait that could be inherited and selected for. Things have not changed one whit since then, as you can see for yourself when you read evolutionists rant on about the evolution of bird-songs, mating-habits, morality, religion, preferenced for blondes, alcoholism, homosexuality... none of which can be idenitfied with anything in genetic matter. Eugenics is merely a consequence of the usual darwinian way of thinking about heredity.
Oh, bravo...well done...
I received my Expelled Event & Resource Kit in today’s Fedex run. Will not have time for a few days to look at it but will let everyone know what it contains as soon as I can.
And,
" It doesn't matter as much to me as it obviously does to you."
Well Coyoteman I believe your showing your true colors (rainbow)!
It seems more like some here are showing their true colors (bigot).
The unreasoned hatred of homosexuals we are now seeing expressed on a regular basis on this site does not do anyone credit, nor does it lend any credibility to their arguments.
And you're showing yours: Yellow.
Would that be a lesbian who posed in Playboy?
It could happen.
A lesbian, who’s good looking enough to pose in Playboy and smart enough to edit Scientific American. If that were a real person, I’d be in love, even though I wouldn’t stand a chance.
Scientists or professors who don’t believe in evo either get “expelled” or shunned.
Seems like somebody is afraid the truth might come out.
Ben Stein asked Dawkins if it COULD be ID, and Dawkins said YES, and GET THIS: Dawkins said it could be intelligent aliens from outer space.
Iv'e heard that some Evolutionist scientists believe it is the highest point in Evolution. Since you know so much about science, what do you say about homosexuality?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.