Posted on 05/17/2008 7:58:50 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy
actually this is going back to the 1980’s when there was similar scandal with the fashion designers using underage models dressed “mature” to sell product.
This is NOT new.
This is NOT a recent development.
This is just the fashion designers being exposed again.
>>so what’s the point in posting some of the pictures?>>
Agreed. We don’t need to be sensationalized, thank you. I see enough flesh walking down the street on an 80-degree day to make me question my vows. Please don’t post pics like this in the future.
To the few feminist pigs on FR who feel it’s a man’s job to control his animal urge, and not the woman’s responsibility to control what she advertises, you are idiots.
>>The Literature Classification Board says it’s not porn.>>
Yeah, and some scholar society says that changing the Bible doesn’t change the meaning. What a bunch of PC crap.
1,147+ views....
This is a conservative forum?
!
?
“This is a conservative forum?”
For your information, I just read the articles.
apparently the mods think that the comments on the kennedy threads are far more important than a mildly cleaned up topless shot of a 16 year old....go figure.
I’m disappointed they are still here several hours later
Maybe so, but it was 30 years ago. Just saying...
I think she needs a sandwich or two.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.