You truly are a a desperate cuss, aren't you? Anyone who doesn't drink the confederate kool-aid is a liberal or a socialist or some such thing.
Your individual opinion on what is constitutional and what is not is meaningless. The Constitution does not say that something is constitutional because cowboyway says so. It gives that authority to the Supreme Court, and last time I checked you aren't a member of the court. So keep on dismissing the Texas v. White decision, it doesn't impress me at all. Unilateral secession is unconstitutional. The Court said do. James Madison said so. And I'll put their opinions way above your's on just about any subject you'd care to name.
So, if Obama's SCOTUS reverses the recent ruling on the 2A and the damnyankee gubmint issues a firearms confiscation order, what are you going to do?
Fortunately I give the court more credit for basic intelligence than I do, well, than I do you. So I'm not worried that I'll ever be faced with a decision like that. But you go right ahead worrying yourself sick over it.
(assuming that even own a weapon, which I doubt given your leftist leanings)
Yes, well we all know how seldom you get anything right.
Let's keep in mind everything that you've stated: individual opinion is meaningless, a supreme court ruling is always right and the union should be held together regardless of what form of government it may take.
And let's sum up your position: the Constitution means whatever an individual says it does, the rule of law is meaningless and the Constitution merely something to wipe your behind on, and some states have more rights than others.
And the court says that we can kill babies from conception until just before breech.
I'm not impressed with your blind allegiance to a small group of elitists. (Our country was founded on the premise of not trusting government. I guess people like you would be considered 'progressive'.)
Fortunately I give the court more credit for basic intelligence than I do, well, than I do you.
Get real, NS. The fact that FOUR of the five justices recently voted that the individual does not have the RKBA doesn't bother you?
Keep sipping that Kool-Aid, NS. Vladimir Lenin loved people like you.
So I'm not worried that I'll ever be faced with a decision like that.
That's it, NS. Don't answer the question. Thats typical of you. When faced with a tough question, you duck and run.
One justice away from a de facto repeal of 2A and these people have your dying loyalty. One justice and perhaps an Obama appointed one at that. And you know what Schumer, Brady, Pelosi, and all the gun control idiots are going to do then, don't you? Is this another court decision that you will blindly adhere to?
Will a future posting from NS go something like, "Give up your guns, cowboyway. The Supreme Court is more intelligent that all of us put together, and, they are the law of the land. And always right. Always. And never politically motivated. Never, never, never. I'm taking mine down to the gun drop off center today. It's right on the way to the re-education center, so I can kill two birds with one stone."
But you go right ahead worrying yourself sick over it.
Some of us have to bear the burden for the head-in-the-sand, useful idiots.
And let's sum up your position: the Constitution means whatever an individual says it does, the rule of law is meaningless and the Constitution merely something to wipe your behind on, and some states have more rights than others.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ