Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR GunClub - Guns of the Future (1958 Edition) :)
Guns Magazine ^ | February 1958 | Lt. Colonel Robert B. Rigg

Posted on 08/18/2008 3:36:33 AM PDT by sig226

Here's a little retro firearms prognostication for Monday.

Click Guns of the Future under the Military bookmark to get to the page.

The author, Lt. Colonel Robert B. Rigg, got a lot of it right. He wrote about sound guns, ray guns, and baby missile launchers. Okay, no ray guns as yet, and the baby missile launcher existed in World War II, but he also predicted individual night vision.

He included the Armalite AR-10, which, of course, morphed into the M-16 rifle and M-4 carbine. The AR-10 in the illustration is a flat top, A-3 type. The M1 Carbine in a photograph has an infrared spotlight on it. Now we have IR bulbs for SureFire lights, and the light mounts on one of several positions on the rifle to work with the night vision optical sight.

The sound gun might get a test run in Denver this month.

Enjoy.


TOPICS: Hobbies; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: banglist; frgc; frgunclub

1 posted on 08/18/2008 3:36:34 AM PDT by sig226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe; Slip18; sig226; Shooter 2.5; Manly Warrior; DaveLoneRanger; Eaker; P8riot; ...

Ping


2 posted on 08/18/2008 3:38:19 AM PDT by sig226 (Obama '08 - No, You Can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226

When my son was a baby, he launched a few missiles...


3 posted on 08/18/2008 3:38:57 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (This election is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if McCain wins, we're still retarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226

BTTT


4 posted on 08/18/2008 3:55:10 AM PDT by JDoutrider (Obama: The Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226

1958? That’s about the time someone was dreaming up my first nylon model 66.


5 posted on 08/18/2008 3:58:13 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sig226

Excellent post!!!


6 posted on 08/18/2008 5:32:33 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (National Enquirer - The paper of record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

I got my first .22 in ‘58.


7 posted on 08/18/2008 6:01:51 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sig226

I wonder if anybody was thinking about the Crap Cannon in ‘58.


8 posted on 08/18/2008 6:21:53 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226

I gotta get me one of those Dardick guns with the triangular bullets.


9 posted on 08/18/2008 6:24:49 AM PDT by LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot ("If you don't have my army supplied, and keep it supplied, we'll eat your mules up, sir"-Gen.Sherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226
Thanks, for the walk down memory lane.

10 posted on 08/18/2008 6:36:15 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 78:35 And they remembered that God was their ROCK, And the Most High God their Redeemer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226

Thanks for that. Takes me way back.


11 posted on 08/18/2008 7:30:48 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sig226
Screw the "guns of the future", I want some of those "guns of the past". Especially at the prices of the past.

I know the dollar was probably worth 10x as much then, but I would still pay $750 in today's dollars for the super-fancy, ultra-rare Circassian walnut stock blanks.

Looking from 1958 to today, they could comprehend the mechanical part of "modern" weapons (other than why the US abandoned the M1911). Modern sights and night vision would be mind-blowing, due to advances in computers, electronics, and optics.

And, of course, there are far more computerized machines making weapons today, and fewer human craftsmen.

12 posted on 08/18/2008 8:01:42 AM PDT by 300winmag (Deterrence is an activity, Destruction is a profession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I was told I did a lot of projectile vomit as a baby...


13 posted on 08/18/2008 10:43:33 AM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sig226

What fun going through that 1958 Gun magazine.

Thanks!


14 posted on 08/18/2008 11:46:51 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot
I gotta get me one of those Dardick guns with the triangular bullets.

You priced any of them *trounds* lately? Now that 13mm Gyrojet rocket projector has some fun possibilities. I knew a feller with one built into his swagger stick....


15 posted on 08/18/2008 11:52:28 AM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: umgud
1958? That’s about the time someone was dreaming up my first nylon model 66.

That's about the time the first M14 rifles were turning up in the hands of U.S. military units. The M60 LMG came along shortly thereafter.

Remington Arms Company brought out the .22 LR caliber Nylon 66 rifle in 1959. I got my first one in 1960 or '61.

1999 magazine article for you *here*.

16 posted on 08/18/2008 11:57:52 AM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: archy

Holy cow. Ya got me on that one. I had no idea those “trounds” ever made it off the drawing board.


17 posted on 08/18/2008 12:54:00 PM PDT by LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot ("If you don't have my army supplied, and keep it supplied, we'll eat your mules up, sir"-Gen.Sherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot

The cartridges were trianglular. The bullets were not. Picture a conventional bullet inside a triangular case.


18 posted on 08/18/2008 2:56:51 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson