Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/16/2008 10:08:51 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Ramius

Do you have a ping list? If so, could you add me?


2 posted on 09/16/2008 10:17:54 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
and parry.....

3 posted on 09/16/2008 10:18:54 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass ("Annoy the media, elect PALIN and McCAIN....errr....McCAIN / PALIN.....MCPALIN" 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Sword fighters unite! (we may need these skills:) ping me if you got one!


4 posted on 09/16/2008 10:21:38 PM PDT by lookout88 (Combat search and rescue officer's dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

I am wondering if you are a member of the SCA...my son is very big into medieval history, including armoring (sp?), leatherworking, medieval martial arts, and just about everything medieval. I will have to email him your post.

He just returned a few weeks ago from an archaeological dig in Belgium. He spent four weeks at an old medieval castle ruin digging and just loved it.

A friend of his recently challenged me to a sword fight...duel I guess (SCA standards) because I made fun of his sword fighting technique which I now see is a legitimate defensive stance (overhead in your post). Seems to me to be limited in strike capability and also, this young man tends to lean back making him a bit off balance for striking at his opponents. That is how we got onto the challenge as I told him that even I as an old man (but who has experience in brawling) can beat him because I would know when he would begin his swing and have plenty of time to react to it...I am not quite so confident now that I see it is a legitimate style of fighting...I don’t really know anything about sword fighting, but will enjoy even getting pounded I am sure. Thanks for posting that information.


5 posted on 09/16/2008 10:25:28 PM PDT by Wpin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

For tomorrow.


6 posted on 09/16/2008 10:29:54 PM PDT by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
..in our system (Japanese-Yagyu Shinkage-ryu), incorporates 9 separate stance(s) working seamless (tying? :) in a defense postures.

7 posted on 09/16/2008 10:40:57 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass ("Annoy the media, elect PALIN and McCAIN....errr....McCAIN / PALIN.....MCPALIN" 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

I have a small but treasured collection of ancient weaponry. If you have a pinglist it would be an honor to be included in it.


8 posted on 09/16/2008 10:59:49 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

I, too would like to be added to any ping list you assemble on this topic.


9 posted on 09/16/2008 11:22:19 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Hmmm...I was always partial to Katanas myself.../shrugs

BTW, anyone know anything about WWII Japanses Officer Katanas??? I have one in a red case and one in a leather case that my Grandfather brought back from the Pacific with him.


11 posted on 09/16/2008 11:47:21 PM PDT by BrianInNC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
Will this work?

12 posted on 09/16/2008 11:53:16 PM PDT by Fichori (ironic: adj. 1 Characterized by or constituting irony. 2 Obamy getting beat up by a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Same as above, if you have a ping list please add me.

Very nice post. Can you link the first post?


14 posted on 09/17/2008 12:13:29 AM PDT by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Please add me to your ping list. I don’t own a blade longer than my Ontario RAT7, but this is fascinating.


15 posted on 09/17/2008 12:23:48 AM PDT by 300winmag (Deterrence is an activity, Destruction is a profession)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
If you do decide to start a ping list, I'd like to be on it.
16 posted on 09/17/2008 5:14:30 AM PDT by VRWCtaz (McCain/Palin '08!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Another for your ping list, if there is one.


17 posted on 09/17/2008 7:02:20 AM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raven92876

ping


18 posted on 09/17/2008 8:33:38 AM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius; 300winmag; IrishCatholic; lookout88; Wpin; spetznaz; Smokin' Joe; HungarianGypsy; neb52; ...
Well... I didn't have a sword ping-list, but I guess I do now. :-) Have added those that asked.

This is a re-post of something that I posted previously on another thread some time ago but it starts off the discussion of swords:

Sword Parts:

There are of course the familiar parts, from left to right on the picture, of Blade, Guard, Grip and Pommel. The Guard is also called the "Cross". Some refer to the Guard as the "Quillions", but that may refer specifically to guards made with fancy loops and hoops, decorations and such.

The Blade is further divided into the "weak" and the "strong". The weak part is that from the point about halfway back and the strong part is from halfway back to the Guard. This comes from the amount of leverage you can apply to the blade. If you bind or parry another sword on the "strong" part, naturally you have much more leverage than if you bind closer to your point. If you bind your strong against your opponent's weak, then you get to control where the swords go.

[language note: The word comes from the german "binden" meaning "to bind" which is when the two swords are in contact, often ending up with the guards locked forcefully. When this happens, a grappling match is about to break out or one of them is about to break the bind and strike decisively. Either way, somebody's about to die. One wonders if this isn't the origin of the expression "to really be in a bind" when one is in deep trouble.]

The blade also has a "long" (or "true") edge and "short" (or "false") edge. This terminology originated with curved swords like a saber or cutlass where one edge is actually longer than the other since it's on the outside of the curve. This terminology applies still to double-edged longswords with straight blades, even though both edges are obviously the same length. In this case it depends on how you're holding it and where your knuckles are. The edge that lines up with your knuckles is the "long" edge. This would be the primary striking edge for the basic downward strike you'd make from high to low. The short edge would be the other one, on the "back" of the blade, that is, the edge that lines up with the webbing of your thumbs.

The short edge is just as useful as the long edge, perhaps more. There are some sneaky underhanded tricks involving strikes with the short edge. More on that another day.

Every blade has an optimal spot on the edges to strike with, just like every baseball bat has a "sweet spot". This is the Center of Percussion (CoP). It's generally just several inches down from the tip. You can find this spot easily by holding the sword out in front of you with one hand, point up, edge-on, and hit the pommel with the heel of your free hand. The sword will vibrate visibly in your hand. There will be two "nodes" in the vibration that don't move. One will be (on a good sword) just at or above your hand no more than an inch or two out from the guard, and the other will be up several inches from the tip. That's the place to hit things. At that spot you get to take advantage of the natural harmonics of the blade, transferring little or no vibration back to your hands and more importantly, not wasting energy that's absorbed into the vibration of the blade. But that said, when you get a chance to cut-- you cut. The whole blade cuts just fine.

Many blades also have a deep groove down each side called a "fuller". In longswords this groove was generally narrow and about 1/2 to 3/4 the length of the blade. In Viking swords the fuller was usually wide, perhaps more than half the whole width of the blade and went all the way down just short of the tip.

Contrary to popular myth this is not a "blood groove" to let blood flow out of a wound more quickly. It doesn't work that way. The primary purpose is to make the blade lighter by removing steel. It also makes the blade stiffer, due to the round concave cross-section on each side. Not all longswords featured a fuller but had a diamond-shaped cross-section. Some had dual or triple fullers in parallel.

Another myth: Longswords were heavy and cumbersome. Not so. Most were only 2.5 to 3.5 lbs, not 10 or more as many people think. With two hands, a properly made one is amazingly lively, fast and nimble. That said, swinging one around for an hour or so-- with intent-- is a heck of a workout. But most sword fights didn't last very long... probably ten or fifteen seconds. Thirty seconds would be a long one.

Another myth: Armor made soldiers slow to move and unable to even get up if they fell down. Nonsense. Sure, chain mail or plate armor was heavy. But not that heavy. It was nothing compared to to what modern soldiers and Marines carry around every day. But more on that another day.

Types of swords.

Just some basics, nowhere near exhaustive, of course:

Longswords, from two-handed to hand-and-a-half (or "bastard" sword). Various lengths and styles. Generally used with both hands without a shield. Often, but not always, with armor or chain mail. Note the differences in grip length, overall length, blade cross-section and distal taper:

Oakeshott Type XIIIa

Oakeshott Type XVa

Single-handed swords, generally used with a shield or buckler (small shield, about 12in to 16in in diameter):

Oakeshott Type Xa

Oakeshott Type XVIII

Viking sword. Most commonly had this sort of "lobed" pommel, and a wide fuller running nearly the full length of the blade. Guards where usually short. Sometimes straight, sometimes curved out toward the tip:

Oakeshott Type Z

And just for fun... The Grosse Messer (German for "big knife", for obvious reasons). It's even bigger than it looks. I've handled one, and decided that it was just silly. If you don't get a good hit on the first strike, it's too heavy and slow to recover. You can't help but overcommit. But then again, if you ~do~ get a good hit, you're done with that job:

Well, that's probably enough for now. Some fun stuff, though, huh?

19 posted on 09/17/2008 9:13:41 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DzcOCyHDqc

;-D


20 posted on 09/17/2008 9:17:01 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
The two best books on swordfighting I have ever read were “The Book of Five Rings” by Myomoto Musashi and “The Book of the Sword” by Richard F. Burton.

Burton (whose wife famously said “If I were a man, I would want to be Richard Burton, but not being a man, I will be his wife”) described the same “Fire and Stones” cut that Musashi advocated for disarming your opponent. In his match to attain the rank of “swordmaster” Burton used the stroke three times to disarm his opponent, until the opponents wrist was so hurt he couldn't continue the match.

21 posted on 09/17/2008 9:19:17 AM PDT by allmendream (Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! RAH RAH RAH! McCain/Palin2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

Please add me to your ping list as well


25 posted on 09/17/2008 9:40:22 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius

I would like to be added to your ping list if there is one.


26 posted on 09/17/2008 9:47:21 AM PDT by Durus ("Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson