Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeFrancesa.com
>>>>>That’s not true...

Hollywood doesn't love Oliver Stone? Since when? LOL Not just anyone could have gotten funds to make "W". Stone is the activist film maker.

Never said anything about big budgets. Although his heyday is over, Stone will always be able to get funding for his films. Btw, Alexander had a huge budget and it turned a profit.

38 posted on 10/17/2008 10:10:29 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man
http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/arts_entertainment/oliver+stone+pokes+fun+at+w/2161847?intcmp=rss_news_itnnews

But Stone was unable to find funding for W from a major Hollywood studio, so he resorted to independent financing. He and his producers aim to have the movie in theaters before this November's presidential election and maybe as soon as October

39 posted on 10/17/2008 10:16:33 PM PDT by MikeFrancesa.com (www.war69.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
Alexander was partially financed from the French.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=alexander.htm

Budget was 155 million. made 34 million domestically if you include the world it made 167 million. It did not turn a profit, you have to make 3 times your budget to turn a real profit, at a minimum twice your budget, now of course it all depends on how much money goes into advertising, so those are not hard and fast rules, but no way 12 million above budget turned a profit for this movie.

43 posted on 10/17/2008 10:24:45 PM PDT by MikeFrancesa.com (www.war69.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson