Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross

I hope you are not the future of Free Republic because your argument is pretty bad.

The military attacks on the Taliban and Saddam are major attacks that are unmatched since Vietnam.

Whether you admit it or not, paleocons and antiamerican war reactionaries coordinate their contempt for military action to make it nearly impossible for the US to make military strikes on the enemy. That is the major reason for no attacks on Iran. The left and right have joined in restraining the Bush administration. I still hope the election might slip that restraint. It is hard to tell.

You speak in a vacuum. He did far better than his father, Reagan or Clinton in attacking our enemies.


55 posted on 11/05/2008 12:35:45 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: lonestar67
I hope you are not the future of Free Republic because your argument is pretty bad.

Too bad for you then. You are outvoted on China. And let me ask you this...who has the most formidable nuclear arsenal on the planet today...and is now explicitly deploying more and reneging on their promises to dismantle anything?

The military attacks on the Taliban and Saddam are major attacks that are unmatched since Vietnam.

There are military actions far more important than conventional wars. Apparently you were oblivious to these facts of History: Reagan DEFEATED the Soviet Union. His military preparedness and deployments and restoration of military pride were keys to helping stop the pellmell rush to a Soviet domination of the Globe. And then his other four pronged attacks ended it altogether. Our greatest nemesis ever. Far graver than Nazi Germany. Unfortunatley, Reagan was never allowed to finish the job on the communist menace that the Soviets had planted here on our own soil...and it has continued to fester and grow until, with Bush's RINO help, 'oila, Obama.

Whether you admit it or not, paleocons and antiamerican war reactionaries coordinate their contempt for military action to make it nearly impossible for the US to make military strikes on the enemy. That is the major reason for no attacks on Iran.

No. Our own Joint Chiefs of Staff have warned Bush that it would be an unqualified "disaster" for the U.S. forces to make the effort. Which calls into question why Bush appointed them to their positions. Who do they really work for?

The left and right have joined in restraining the Bush administration.

The Right? Not really.

I still hope the election might slip that restraint. It is hard to tell.

No. It isn't hard to tell. He won't. Do. Anything.

You speak in a vacuum. He did far better than his father, Reagan or Clinton in attacking our enemies.

It is you speaking in a vacuum. Iran will soon be able to launch nuclear missiles at us. No action. China builds its own sneak attack capabilities to immense degrees. And Russia/NeoSoviet gets back on its KGB feet right under W's nose. And he does NOTHING.

He dismantled our MX missiles. Half our B-1Bs. Half our Minutemans. No new ones of any kind built. No Operation Looking Glass flying to thwart sneak attacks. And Russia continues to deploy new missiles.

56 posted on 11/05/2008 12:53:40 PM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson