A canard. Stealing, murder, and breaking of contracts without just process infringe on another's rights. These are not laws for morality per se but of protection from infringement of one individual on another.
A law requiring a car to stop at a red light prevents one individual from colliding into another, an infringement. However, a law requiring the use of a seat-belt does not prevent an infringement of one individual on another. It is an overextension of government forcing a private choice on the individual 'for his own good.' A driving moral requirement that is not the purview of a limited government. The individual must be able to make the wise choice of safeguarding himself, a personal moral decision.
“Stealing, murder, and breaking of contracts without just process infringe on another’s rights.”
Ok. And infringing on another’s rights - whether his right to own property, or live, or speak - is immoral.
So my “canard” stands.