[LongElegantLegs]

Because the dog he owns isn’t the same sort as the dog I’d like to see banned. He does not own what I understand to be a “Pit Bull”:

Well then, in the future, instead of incorrectly refering to 'pit bulls', perhaps you could correctly identify the animals you want to ban as 'any random dog that happens to make Diehard soil his undergarments by looking scary'.

Thanks. :-)

[DieHard the Hunter]

> Well then, in the future, instead of incorrectly refering to ‘pit bulls’ (snip)

I am correctly referring to “Pit Bulls” as ill-bred dangerous mungrel mutts of random parentage engineered to be antisocial and to fight and kill.

And, strangely enough, they fight to the death in “Dog Pits” — hence the name “Pit Bull”. People bet on them: the “winner” goes to the vet, and the “loser” gets buried.

Of a necessity they conform to a general configuration: they are muscular with a wide neck and they have a crushing bite, their ears are either short or cropped and they sit low to the ground — but they are not a proper breed.

Does *that* describe your dog? No?? Then perhaps instead you should stop calling your pup something that it is not, before it gets banned.

[PleaseNoMore]

Dog Ordinance Ruled Uncontitutional

http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Articles/Legislative/2007andolder/Dog%20Ord%20ruled%20unconstitutional%201207.pdf