Replies

He argued that, as a juvenile, everyone engages in some form of delinquent behavior. And he correctly pointed out that not everyone who engages in delinquency is caught and, therefore, labeled “delinquent.”
Tannenbaum was also correct in saying that parents, teachers, and peers sometimes over-react to juveniles caught in an act of delinquency. He was again on firm ground in asserting that these occasional over-reactions could actually produce more delinquency.

From personal experience I think this is correct.

When I was a kid in the 50's there was one kid whose cards were stacked basically against him from the start.

His father was a career criminal who was dead. So his mother had to raise all the kids. Him and two older sisters iirc.
His mother hated him (really). She always said he was no good so he acted like it. He stole a car and took two others along for the joy ride. They got busted by the cops.

At court his mother told the judge he was no good and to to LOCK HIM UP, So the judge did. The other two got off with a slap on the wrist thanks to supportive parents.

Bad kid goes off to Juvy jail, gets worse and breaks out of Juvy jail. (with a kid who killed his father - nice, huh)
Both get caught in another stolen car, repeat juvy jail in/out cycle over and over.

Out of jail at 18, disappears from neighborhood (we didn't miss him).

Pops up a few years later a full blown career criminal. Now a Hi-jacking specialist.
We think he died in Prison. (Thanks Mom!)

There were other kids in the hood without a father due to war and 'stuff', but their mothers didn't hate them. We turned out okay.