Posted on 12/27/2008 7:04:54 AM PST by Free America52
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified "No FreeLunch" Add sender to Contacts To: dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Below are two official emails that dispute the public version of Obamas Birth and his mothers marriage to BHO Sr.
From: pubrec@u.washington.edu [mailto:pubrec@u.washington.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 Subject: Re: Stanley "Ann" Dunham 1960 to 1970 class registration
Ms. Stanley Ann Dunham (BHO IIs mom) was enrolled at the University of Washington for:
Autumn 1961
Winter 1962
Spring 1962
The records responsive to your request from the University of Washington are above as provided by the Public Disclosure Laws of Washington State. This concludes the Universitys response to your Public Records request. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions or concerns.
Madolyne Lawson Office of Public Records 206-543-9180
From: Stuart Lau [mailto:stuartl@hawaii.edu] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 Subject: Re: Inquiry
The University of Hawaii at Manoa is only able to provide the following information for Stanley Ann Dunham: Dates of attendance: Fall 1960 (First day of instruction 9/26/1960) Spring 1963 - Summer 1966 Fall 1972 - Fall 1974 Summer 1976 Spring 1978 Fall 1984 - Summer 1992
Degrees awarded: BA - Mathematics, Summer 1967 (August 6, 1967) MA - Anthropology, Fall 1983 (December 18, 1983) PhD - Anthropology, Summer 1992 (August 9, 1992)
Sincerely, Stuart Lau **************************************** Stuart Lau University Registrar Office of Admissions and Records University of Hawaii at Manoa Ph: (808) 956-8010 ****************************************
(Excerpt) Read more at drorly.blogspot.com ...
It has been shown that Jr lied in his book and neglected to even mention that his mother actually left his father not the reverse. It has also been proven that people would much rather bury their heads in the sand than to actually discover the true facts about Jr and his life they would rather blindly accept that what Jr has written and what the media propose is the truth when it isn’t! Excuse me, but many Americans are more willing to live by truth, justice and the American way but if you want to roll over and play dead then leave these threads and quite posting links to FactCheck and FighttheSmears. Do you really have an explanation as to why the fact that Jr held dual citizenship from birth was not posted at FighttheSmears UNTIL after the election? Do you have an explanation as to why the news of Madelyn Dunham’s death ocurred the 2nd of November but the news wasn’t released until it could be announced for the evening broadcasts on Nov.3rd? Do you have an explanation as to why the purported photos posted at FactCheck were taken March 20, 2008 and yet they clearly show two fold marks while the same purported certificate at FighttheSmears was posted June 12,2008 and yet shows only one fold mark? Do you really like being led around by a ring in your nose or would you like to know the truth? I suspect that you prefer to be amongst those for whom the phrase:”There are none so blind as those who do not see” is a fitting metaphor to describe you! If you prefer to remain blind then please leave these threads, as I am sure there are other posts which will interest you.
Do you really like being led around by a ring in your nose
You got it, that would be curiosity
tinfoil? Nut job? I’m more concerned about you overdosing on the koolaid
I think C.E. is doing it for the lurkers, you know... And to crush the opposition, and have fun doing it!
Your claim that you don’t want Free Republic to appear as if it has been taken over by tinfoil nutjobs is laughable, just as is your claim that actually looking in a Polk’s Seattle City Directory for the years 1961 and 1962 is arduous and lengthy research! If you failed to notice on the home page of FR Jim Robinson posted the following:
“As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.”
Did you fail to notice “...defending the constitution” in your magnamious claim that you fear that Free Republic will be ridiculed because of the tinfoil hat birthers, who are defending the constitution by continuing to do the proper research that the presstitutes in the msm failed to do! It takes much more than reading an “autobiography” to vet candidates for the position of President and CIC and citizens of the U.S were failed miserably which means they have had to do their own research. You advocate absolutely nothing true to the values of Freepers who believe that they should defend the constitution especially considering so many took an oath to defend the constitution. My final words of advice for you are if you cannot lead, then you will simply follow Jr and his empty suit which means “get the hell out of the way” of those patriots who feel it is their right to ask questions!
That's Long Legged Mack Daddy to you.
Well said!
Thank-you kindly! Taking a keyboard bow!
And very necessary research, too!
I live in a city whose public library is blessed with a wonderful "history room" which contains old books, magazines, ephemera, newspaper clippings, aerial photos, and telephone directories. In an adjoining room are parcel books and insurance maps, which are very old and very detailed. These are the primary sources so essential to researchers. Looking through these old scraps one can find many things overlooked by most journalists. It's tedious to have to plow through all this old stuff, but those who do so are richly rewarded. It's like panning for gold.
I don’t believe that having to look through two years of city directories would take as much time as I have spent researching various aspects of Jr’s life and family and others associated with him. I definitely recognize the value of research and its historic value and it helps that I was at loose ends once I shattered my upper right arm. Doing research made time not hang so heavy for me! Since Jr has such little idea of how important history is he will more than likely repeat the mistakes of the past. The presstitutes who hail Jr as their saviour couldn’t be bothered to properly vet or research him to the detriment of the American citizens!
If I didn’t live 12 plus hours from Seattle I would be there in a heartbeat to do the research and I would go any other place to research as well!
Agreed, and I applaud your efforts! You are doing the work that the journalists should be doing but alas, are not.
Isn’t it ironic that the presstitutes could head for Alaska as a horde to investigate Sarah Palin but they couldn’t be bothered to do more than read Jr’s book? Sheer hypocrisy is a common trait for Democrats and even Malcom X recognized that fact! As he phrased it to unions, “You will always choose the Democrats first, while the Democrats will always choose you last.”
Is there "media" or is there rather the Ministry of Propaganda.Are there "journalists" and "reporters" or are there not legions of New Soviet Men, Orwellian Doublethinking Inner Party operatives, Hofferian True Believers.
These are incapable of seeing any flaw in glorious leader.
It is not that they do not look for it, but that the thought would never occur to them, that its suggestion would raise a rolling growl in their pack.
Like the Night of the Living Dead, when the sun goes down, they head to Alaska to suck Sarah Palin's blood, but when the sun comes up, they don't turn on Hussein--they go back to bed and shut their coffins.
Jihad is peace, Islam is peace, war is peace;
Freedom is only a buzzword; orthodoxy is comforting and effortless; obedience is redeeming, but freedom would be risky, you could put your eye out, as in Rand's Anthem "we" tremble at the thought of "I"--in fact there is no independence for such behavior draws a Joe-the-Plumber attack: freedom is slavery;
Knowing is not valued--only "everybody knows" is valued, the dogma, that's the thing--to NOT know but to obey the order to chant (yes we can), for knowledge is risky, weakens one's security--ignorance is strength.
Maybe some Seattle freeper could do it. I live about 10 hours from Seattle or I’d do it!
No, all that's happened is some anonymous blogger found some suggestive evidence that his Mother left his father. It has hardly dispositive.
But maybe it's true. So what? Why should anyone care whether his mother left his father or the other way around?
So what if Obama got the details wrong of how his parents parted? We're talking about events that happened when he was 1-2 years old fer Chrissake. Nobody cares.
quite posting links to FactCheck and FighttheSmears.
There's nothing wrong with Factcheck. True, they were biased in that they tended to correct errors coming out of the McCain camp more often than errors coming out of the Obama camp. However, their reputation for accuracy is spotless. If you can name an example where they posted a outright falsehood, or perpetrated an outright fraud, then I'm all ears.
I never posted any links to FighttheSmears.
Do you really have an explanation as to why the fact that Jr held dual citizenship from birth was not posted at FighttheSmears UNTIL after the election?
I have no idea, and I don't see why it matters. Nor do I see why it matters that the Queen of England claimed him as a subject when he was born, the crackpot lawsuits claiming otherwise notwithstanding.
Do you have an explanation as to why the news of Madelyn Dunhams death ocurred the 2nd of November but the news wasnt released until it could be announced for the evening broadcasts on Nov.3rd?
No. Maybe the family wanted some privacy so they could morn in peace before the media got wind of it. Maybe they just wanted to piss the media off. Maybe they thought it would be amusing to create some fodder for conspiracy theorists like you. Who cares?
Do you have an explanation as to why the purported photos posted at FactCheck were taken March 20, 2008 and yet they clearly show two fold marks while the same purported certificate at FighttheSmears was posted June 12,2008 and yet shows only one fold mark?
First of all, the factcheck photo was posted on August 21. I saw no indication it was taken on March 20. What makes you think it was taken on that date?
But let's for sake of argument grant it was taken on March 20 (which I seriously doubt). Folds? You've got to be kidding me. You're obcessing over folds? This is too funny.
Did you ever stop to think that the factcheck people took a picture of a different copy of the COLB than the one scanned onto the fightthesmears website?
You do realize it is possible to obtain multiple official copies of the document from the state, and each one is just as valid for proving the location and date of birth as the original vault copy. It would not surprise me in the least if the Obama campaign had several official copies. They probably kept one at their headquarters, which is the one they scanned onto their website, and they sent another to Factcheck and other media outlets.
But I bet you never thought of that, did you? Oh no, it's much more fun to go making up conspiracy theories about frauds.
Do you really like being led around by a ring in your nose or would you like to know the truth?
B. Hussein Obama is a self-obcessed, unseasoned and intellectually shallow man who is one of the least prepared presidents in history. It is a true shame he has been elected. All conservatives have a duty to oppose the leftist policies he is sure to propose, and working to unseat him in 2012.
But when we oppose him, we have to do it on substance.
If you think gossipping about his mother's marital status or spinning crackpot conspiracy theories about folds on a birth certificate (LOL!) are going to do any good, then you might as well change your name to Don Quixote and go tilt at some windmills.
The certification of live birth he already showed is perfectly valid proof of both his birth date and brith place.
Legit, issue dead.
Even if he showed his vault copy (which is unnecessary to prove place of birth, BTW), within hours you would have more supposed experts with phony Ph.D.'s claiming it is a fake.
Nothing will satisfy the birthers.
lawsuits on everything he does.
All of which get dismissed. So why should he care?
Also lets see those medical records too
Why? He chose not to disclose them, and the voters elected him anyway. They obviously don't care what's in those records.
I want to unstead this guy in 2012 as badly as you, but this is not the way to do it. We need to oppose him on substance.
If you'd rather go spinning tales about his mother's medical status, or coming up with crackpot conspiracy theories about fraudulant birth certificates, then go change your name to Don Quixote and go tilt at some windmills.
Your story sounds the most plausible of ALL. You’ve sold me.
I see. So by "discovering" that Obama's mother was not actually married at the time of his birth, and that she left his father and not the other way around, you are defending the Constitution!
RFLOL. This has got to be satire. I can't believe anyone would seriously make such a claim.
That's very good. You had me fooled up until now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.