Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: traderrob6
I agree.

Think about it.

If nothing else, Zero the Antihero's continued refusal to lay his cards face up on the table for all to see has ensured and resulted in the SCOTUS, not to mention how many lower courts, being tied up with having to address the matter. This takes time, resources, people, and MONEY. More so, every minute spent dealing with this issue, or non-issue as the csae may be, takes that same time, resources, people, and MONEY away from other cases.

It makes no sense to do what 0 has done and continues to do, UNLESS he—to borrow from his own phrazemology—”HAS SOME SKIN IN THE GAME.”

I laughed this off at first. But the longer it has dragged on and the more I've watched how 0's peeps have scrambled to head off any new cases and/or movement forward on the old/pending cases, I am convinced there is something here.

What it all comes down to is all sides are playing poker. The ONLY players in the game who have had to show their cards are those who have CALLED 0bambi’s BET. WTH? He gets to keep playing the same hand but never has to show his cards, while everyone else starts with new cards from a fresh deck, and it is for them a new hand and round? Huh? That makes no sense. I've yet to hear the dealer (courts?) say “YOU WIN, 0bambi.” It's always, “You LOSE, challenger.”

IF I understand what I am seeing, then the courts have NOT declared Zed the winner. They have only told the challengers that they have yet to win. MAYBE they are doing all they can to hint at the fact that they know 0 has a losing hand, but the challenger(s) has/have to come up with the cards to beat it? Could it be that they are saying by their actions "DON'T STOP; KEEP TRYING?" Maybe. The SCOTUS will need this to be airtight and buttoned up, if they can be expected to rule against 0bami. This is the big dance, guys and gals. The ramifications of a ruling against 0 would set this country and the world on its ear. For that reason alone the SCOTUS will not move forward unless and until it is a slam-dunk certainty that this guy is not only ineligible but guilty of crimes (perjury, tampering, conspiracy, et al) that will lead to criminal prosecution and prison. Yes, the charges have to be that egregious and the outcome has to be that certain and. Otherwise, no dice.

The Kenyan is playing cards that he was never dealt. Given how this has gone and continues to go, the challengers can beat him only if they can lay all 52 cards on the table. At that point 0's cards become the “Emperor's NO Clothes.”

55 posted on 01/11/2009 10:41:21 AM PST by shoutingandpointing (Just say, "nn-nn-NO!" to Campbell's soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: shoutingandpointing
I laughed this off at first. But the longer it has dragged on and the more I've watched how 0’s peeps have scrambled to head off any new cases and/or movement forward on the old/pending cases, I am convinced there is something here.

Same with me. I laughed it off at first, now I'm convinced. Also the lawsuits will escalate once he is actually sworn in. It will be easier. Everything he does or tries to do citizens can band together and file lawsuits and they will. There are many waiting to be filed right now.

58 posted on 01/11/2009 10:45:58 AM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: shoutingandpointing
For that reason alone the SCOTUS will not move forward unless and until it is a slam-dunk

Is that sorta like needing to get George Washington's signature on it? Nothing is going to happen. Now if the 62 million that voted against Barry were to be know to riot, then we might here the case. The pacifist will get s*%# on.

63 posted on 01/11/2009 11:03:39 AM PST by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: shoutingandpointing
If nothing else, Zero the Antihero's continued refusal to lay his cards face up on the table for all to see has ensured and resulted in the SCOTUS, not to mention how many lower courts, being tied up with having to address the matter.

A. The amount of time justices have spent pondering these frivolous cases can probably be measured in minutes.

B. No court has ordered Obama to produce his birth certificate. At any rate, they'd have to order Hawaii to produce the vault BC as it is the state's property, not Obama's.

C. Even if produced, Berg's followers would just claim it's a forgery.

D. Even if proven authentic, Donofrio's followers would claim it doesn't matter due to his Kenyan father's lack of American citizenship.

E. Should SCOTUS rule in the affirmative on Obama's natural born status, they'll just be accused of legislating from the bench.

Where would it end with the conspiracy crowd? The people who want to believe that Obama isn't eligible to serve as President will never be convinced otherwise.

65 posted on 01/11/2009 11:06:15 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: shoutingandpointing
It makes no sense to do what 0 has done and continues to do, UNLESS he—to borrow from his own phrazemology—”HAS SOME SKIN IN THE GAME.”

Notice how many elected GOP folks are talkin about it? NONE

Maybe the skin Obama has, is waiting to burn the GOP with his certificate, if and only if required to do so by a court. Or if some prominent GOP people talk it up.

Remember when other (white) Presidents-elect handed out their birth certificates, in the past? NONE

Can you say racist rightwingers only want certificate from black President elect, although never required in the past?

Prominent GOP figures aren't walking into a fairly obvious political trap.

178 posted on 01/11/2009 4:39:21 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson