Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
"It’s only those with 'Obama Derangement Syndrome' who think I’m an apologist for Obama."

Is THAT all? LOL...Would that be those of us who believe Barry Hussein 0bama-Soetoro is a complete fraud?

"I campaigned against Obama prior to the election and saw that I lost — I got outvoted by the Obama people...So, afterwards, I saw that the way to stop Obama was to properly vet him through state laws...

Your heart's in the right place, but you're surrendering your intellect to implausibilities. There is a time to be cynical. Bush allowed a tsunami-sized Mexican Illegal Invasion to go on unabated. 0bama was NEVER "vetted." PERIOD.

"The ones who continue to beat a dead horse over what a court of law will do nothing about, and especially since Obama is the President and it takes an Impeachment hearing to do anything about that...

So you've surrendered and expect others to do as well?

With all due respect, kindly get out of the way, madam. The Constitution must not be trampled upon any further; there are still many who shall NOT be deterred from the seeking the truth.

"I just see what 'reality is' — and go for what works, hence the route of 'state laws' for vetting candidates."

No. You're a "pragmatist" - There's a huge difference. But don't worry - we'll chase down that horse that left the barn you gave up on.

32 posted on 02/24/2009 5:18:30 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: F16Fighter

You said — “Is THAT all? LOL...Would that be those of us who believe Barry Hussein 0bama-Soetoro is a complete fraud?”

Well, under our particular system of justice, when someone is accused of being a fraud and there is legal action to be taken — it is customary to *prove it*.

The funny thing about this “prove it” (on behalf of the accuser...) is that the ones with Obama Derangement Syndrome think that the “crook” (according to them) must “prove that he is a crook” — in order for their case to be adjudicated... LOL..

And, there has been no court that has accepted anything in the way of proof that moves this case forward in order to remove Obama from office. That’s the failure of the Obama Derangement Syndrome people to prove their case. No court will move on the absence of anything that can prove the accusation of fraud.

Obviously many of the Obama Derangement Syndrome people don’t know much about the justice system... :-)

And that’s precisely why I say that the way to “vet a candidate” is by passing state laws requiring specific documentation for candidates, like Oklahoma and Arizona are doing.


34 posted on 02/24/2009 5:23:33 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: F16Fighter

You also said — “So you’ve surrendered and expect others to do as well?”

No, I’m working with my own legislator in Oklahoma for laws to properly vet a candidate with specified paperwork...


35 posted on 02/24/2009 5:24:57 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson