Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne; RobRoy
Kirk circumvented this process. He was never evaluated in this manner. If that was a prerequisite, then he received preferential treatment by being allowed to pass without taking the test.

As I recall, Spock says he (Kirk) took the test "three times", and therefore did face the real test twice. Since there can be no "winning" of the scenario -- normally -- I always figured this meant that cadets who were dissatisfied with their own performance could opt to re-take it. Indeed, the question of how many times a candidate chooses to subject themselves to a no-win scenario, and their reasons for doing so, might very well be part of what the Academy evaluates.

71 posted on 03/06/2009 11:17:46 AM PST by Sloth (The tree of liberty desperately needs watering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Sloth

I think that’s a well stated response. What I would question is whether it would be a good thing to have someone take the test five times, fail miserably on four of them, then pass once and be considered a good candidate for leadership.

I would have some serious concerns over that candidate.

There is still the question in my mind, what value a test can have if you know from the onset that you cannot win.


76 posted on 03/06/2009 11:24:19 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Resolved: Gregg, McCain, Snowe, Spectre: 2010, Collins, Graham: 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson